2125 lines
116 KiB
Markdown
Executable File
2125 lines
116 KiB
Markdown
Executable File
# CFP Exam Study Tracker
|
||
|
||
**Last Updated**: November 7, 2025
|
||
**Exam Date**: November 10, 2025
|
||
**Days Until Exam**: 3 days ⚠️
|
||
|
||
This single document tracks ALL your CFP exam preparation progress, including:
|
||
- Topics mastered from study sessions
|
||
- Knowledge gaps identified
|
||
- Study materials available (2024 Dalton slides)
|
||
- Priority action plan
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Quick Stats
|
||
|
||
📊 **Overall Progress**: 60/73 topics covered = **82%**
|
||
📚 **Study Materials**: 1,088 pages of 2024 Dalton slides
|
||
⏰ **Time Remaining**: 3 days ⚠️
|
||
🎯 **Target**: Pass CFP exam November 10, 2025
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Domain Progress Summary
|
||
|
||
| Domain | Weight | Topics Covered | Slides Available | Status | Priority |
|
||
|--------|--------|----------------|------------------|--------|----------|
|
||
| **A. Professional Conduct** | 8% | 0/6 | ✓ 90 pages | ⚪ Not Started | Medium |
|
||
| **B. General Principles** | 15% | 8/10 | ✓ 90 pages | 🟡 In Progress (80%) | **HIGH** |
|
||
| **C. Insurance & Risk** | 11% | 10/10 | ✓ 188 pages | 🟢 **COMPLETE (100%)** ✅ | **DONE** |
|
||
| **D. Investment Planning** | 17% | 9/9 | ✓ 188 pages | 🟢 **COMPLETE (100%)** ✅ | **DONE** |
|
||
| **E. Tax Planning** | 14% | 8/8 | ✓ 150 pages | 🟢 **COMPLETE (100%)** ✅ | **DONE** |
|
||
| **F. Retirement** | **18%** ⭐ | 10/10 | ✓ 182 pages | 🟢 **COMPLETE (100%)** ✅ | **DONE** |
|
||
| **G. Estate Planning** | 10% | 9/14 | ✓ 200 pages | 🟡 In Progress (64%) | Medium |
|
||
| **H. Psychology** | 7% | 2/6 | ⚠️ Minimal | 🟡 Started (33%) | Medium |
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## A. Professional Conduct and Regulation (8%)
|
||
|
||
**Slides**: Fundamentals (pages 1-40)
|
||
|
||
### Not Yet Studied (0/6 topics)
|
||
|
||
- [ ] **A.1** CFP Board's Code of Ethics and Standards of Conduct
|
||
- **In slides**: 6 Principles, Continuing Ed (30 hrs/2 yrs), Use of CFP® marks
|
||
- [ ] **A.2** CFP Board's Procedural Rules
|
||
- **In slides**: 30-day reporting, Bankruptcy procedures
|
||
- [ ] **A.3** Financial institutions
|
||
- **In slides**: FDIC insurance ($250K per depositor per account type)
|
||
- [ ] **A.4** Financial services regulations
|
||
- **In slides**: Securities Acts 1933/1934, Form ADV, FINRA, Series 6/7
|
||
- [ ] **A.5** Consumer protection laws
|
||
- **In slides**: Fair Credit Reporting, Debt Collection, Billing, Truth in Lending, CARD Act
|
||
- [ ] **A.6** Fiduciary standard
|
||
- **In slides**: Duties to clients, Conflicts of interest, Confidentiality, Fee-Only vs Fee-Based
|
||
|
||
**Priority**: Medium - Review in final 2 weeks
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## B. General Principles of Financial Planning (15%)
|
||
|
||
**Slides**: Fundamentals (pages 40-90)
|
||
|
||
### ✅ Mastered Topics (8/10)
|
||
|
||
- [x] **B.7 Financial planning process** (2025-10-20) - **Medium-High confidence**
|
||
- **Integrated planning**: Address stated client objectives, identify gaps
|
||
- **Estate preservation** vs estate building vs income generation
|
||
- Real-world intuition vs CFP exam logic
|
||
- **Gina LTC problem**: Learned to match recommendation to stated objectives
|
||
- **In slides**: Pages 40-45 (7-step process)
|
||
|
||
- [x] **B.8 Financial statements** (2025-11-01) - **High confidence** (PARTIAL)
|
||
- **Fixed vs Variable Cash Outflows** (2025-11-01) - MASTERED:
|
||
- **Fixed Expenses**: Same exact dollar amount every single month
|
||
- Can predict EXACT number, doesn't change based on usage
|
||
- Examples: Mortgage, car loan, insurance premiums, HOA fees, subscriptions, property taxes
|
||
- Test: Can you predict the exact $? If YES → Fixed
|
||
- **Variable Expenses**: Amount changes month to month
|
||
- Know you'll have expense, but dollar varies based on usage/season/behavior
|
||
- Examples: Utilities, food/groceries, gas, travel, clothing, medical, home maintenance
|
||
- Test: Can you predict the exact $? If NO (could be $100 or $300) → Variable
|
||
- **Key Distinction**: Regular expense ≠ Fixed expense
|
||
- Utilities are REGULAR (pay monthly) but VARIABLE (amount changes)
|
||
- Mortgage is REGULAR and FIXED (same $2,500 every month)
|
||
- **Budgeting Application**:
|
||
- Step 1: Calculate fixed expenses (non-negotiable floor)
|
||
- Step 2: Estimate variable expenses (average with buffer)
|
||
- Step 3: Build flexibility for variable fluctuations
|
||
- **Memory Trick**: "If the NUMBER changes, it's VARIABLE. If the NUMBER is the SAME, it's FIXED"
|
||
- Perfect understanding after one explanation ✓
|
||
- **In slides**: Pages 45-50 (Balance sheet, Income statement, Cash flow statement)
|
||
- **Still need to cover**: Net worth calculation, asset/liability classification, balance sheet structure
|
||
|
||
- [x] **B.9 Cash flow management** (2025-10-20, 2025-10-29, 2025-11-01) - **High confidence**
|
||
- **Emergency fund guidelines**: 3-6 months of expenses
|
||
- **6-month rule**: Married with one income source (vs 3 months dual income)
|
||
- **Liquidity assessment**: What counts as accessible funds
|
||
- **Key rule**: Assets maturing within 3-6 months count as emergency fund
|
||
- **Jack problem**: Bond maturing in 3 months = liquid ($44,200 total) ✓
|
||
- **What counts**:
|
||
- Cash, savings, money market
|
||
- Short-term CDs
|
||
- Bonds maturing within 3-6 months (no market risk)
|
||
- **What doesn't count**:
|
||
- Retirement accounts (penalties + taxes)
|
||
- Long-term bonds not near maturity (market value risk)
|
||
- **Home Equity Access Methods** (2025-10-29) - MASTERED (with critical analysis):
|
||
- **Four methods to utilize home equity**:
|
||
1. **Reverse mortgage** (age 62+): Keep house, receive payments, repaid at death/move
|
||
2. **Home sale**: Sell house, convert equity to cash (lose house)
|
||
3. **Second mortgage**: Keep house, borrow 70-80% equity as lump sum
|
||
4. **HELOC**: Keep house, draw as needed like credit card
|
||
- **CRITICAL INSIGHT** - Student identified question flaw:
|
||
- Normal usage: "Access equity" = keep house (methods 1, 3, 4)
|
||
- Question says "utilize equity" = includes selling (all 4 methods)
|
||
- Student correctly argued selling shouldn't be called "accessing"
|
||
- **Excellent professional judgment**: CFP should test real-world communication
|
||
- For exam: "Utilize/monetize/convert" = broader than "access"
|
||
- Home Equity = Home Value - Mortgage Balance
|
||
- Selling converts illiquid equity → liquid cash
|
||
- **In slides**: Pages 45-50
|
||
|
||
- [x] **B.12 Time value of money** (2025-10-17) - **High confidence**
|
||
- PV/FV calculations: FV = PV × (1 + r)^n
|
||
- Compound interest
|
||
- **In slides**: Pages 50-55, formulas and examples
|
||
- **Note**: Had prior knowledge, perfect execution
|
||
|
||
- [x] **B.10 Financing and debt management** (2025-11-01) - **High confidence**
|
||
- **Financial Ratios - The "28-36 + 3-6-10" Memory System** (2025-11-01) - MASTERED:
|
||
- **Housing Ratio (Front-end)**: Monthly Housing (PITI) ÷ Gross Monthly Income ≤ **28%**
|
||
- PITI = Principal, Interest, Taxes, Insurance
|
||
- Only housing costs, not other debt
|
||
- **Total Debt Ratio (Back-end)**: Total Monthly Debt ÷ Gross Monthly Income ≤ **36%**
|
||
- Includes ALL debt: Housing + car + student loans + credit cards + other
|
||
- **Emergency Fund Ratio**: **3-6 months** of expenses saved
|
||
- 6 months if: Married with one income OR self-employed
|
||
- 3 months if: Dual income household
|
||
- **Current Ratio**: Current Assets ÷ Current Liabilities ≥ **1.0** (higher is better)
|
||
- Measures liquidity - can you pay short-term debts?
|
||
- **Savings Ratio**: Annual Savings ÷ Gross Annual Income = **10-12%**
|
||
- Includes retirement contributions, emergency fund savings
|
||
- **Memory Trick**: "28 before 36" (Housing comes before Total, like house is foundation)
|
||
- **Memory System**: "28-36 Rule + 3-6-10" (debt ratios, then emergency months, then savings %)
|
||
- Perfect on practice problem (Sarah & Tom 27% housing, 35% total debt) ✓
|
||
- **In slides**: Pages 50-60 (Ratios, Mortgages, Buy vs Rent)
|
||
- **Still need to cover**: Mortgage types (conventional, ARM, reverse), refinancing decisions, buy vs rent analysis
|
||
|
||
- [x] **B.11 Economic concepts** (2025-10-27) - **Medium confidence** (PARTIAL)
|
||
- **Fiscal Policy** (MASTERED):
|
||
- Fiscal = Government (Congress/President) uses taxes and spending
|
||
- Monetary = Federal Reserve uses interest rates and money supply
|
||
- **Restrictive/Contractionary fiscal policy**: Increase taxes + Decrease spending
|
||
- Goal: Slow economy to fight inflation
|
||
- Result: Budget surplus → Pays down government debt
|
||
- **Expansionary fiscal policy**: Decrease taxes + Increase spending
|
||
- Goal: Stimulate economy
|
||
- Result: Budget deficit → Increases debt
|
||
- **Key distinction**: Fiscal vs Monetary are different tools, not opposing forces
|
||
- **GDP Components** (MASTERED):
|
||
- **Formula**: GDP = C + I + G + NX (MUST MEMORIZE)
|
||
- C = Consumption (household spending, ~70% of GDP)
|
||
- I = Investment (business spending + new home purchases)
|
||
- G = Government Spending (salaries, military, infrastructure)
|
||
- NX = Net Exports (Exports - Imports)
|
||
- **What GDP measures**: PRODUCTION, not debt or financial metrics
|
||
- **What's NOT in GDP**: National debt, exchange rates, GNI
|
||
- **Economic Indicators** (PARTIAL):
|
||
- Federal Reserve's dual mandate: Low inflation (~2%) + High employment
|
||
- **Indicators Fed watches**: GDP growth, unemployment rate, inflation (PPI/CPI/PCE)
|
||
- **National debt**: Affects rates indirectly (crowding out), but not primary Fed indicator
|
||
- Student showed excellent real-world observation skills
|
||
- **In slides**: Pages 60-90
|
||
- **Still need to cover**: Business cycle (4 phases), monetary/fiscal policy tools, supply/demand
|
||
|
||
- [x] **B.13 Education needs analysis** (2025-10-27) - **Medium confidence** (PARTIAL)
|
||
- **What it calculates**: How much to SAVE for future education costs
|
||
- **Key factors needed**:
|
||
- ✅ Expected inflation rate (project future costs)
|
||
- ✅ Time until college begins (time horizon for savings/investments)
|
||
- ✅ Expected investment returns
|
||
- **What's NOT included**:
|
||
- ❌ Student's career longevity (happens after college, irrelevant to costs)
|
||
- ❌ Family's financial aid contribution (too uncertain, separate analysis)
|
||
- **Critical distinction**:
|
||
- **Education Needs Analysis** (CFP does): Calculate costs and required savings
|
||
- **Financial Aid Analysis** (FAFSA does): Estimate aid eligibility (separate process)
|
||
- **Planning approach**: Plan for full cost, treat financial aid as bonus (don't rely on uncertain aid)
|
||
- **In slides**: Pages 55-60
|
||
- **Still need to cover**: Detailed calculation methodology, SAI (Student Aid Index), dependency status
|
||
|
||
- [x] **B.14 Education savings vehicles** (2025-11-01) - **High confidence**
|
||
- **Financial Aid Decision Tree** (2025-11-01) - MASTERED:
|
||
- **When financial aid mentioned**: Roth IRA (parent's)
|
||
- NOT counted as asset on FAFSA (retirement accounts excluded = 0% assessment)
|
||
- Contributions can be withdrawn anytime, tax-free, penalty-free
|
||
- Protects aid eligibility
|
||
- Distributions DO count as income (time strategically - after last FAFSA year)
|
||
- **When financial aid NOT mentioned**: 529 Plan
|
||
- Higher contribution limits ($100K+ per child)
|
||
- State tax deduction (in most states)
|
||
- No income limits
|
||
- Tax-free growth for qualified education expenses
|
||
- **FAFSA Asset Treatment**:
|
||
- Roth IRA (parent): 0% assessment ✅ BEST for financial aid
|
||
- 529 Plan: 5.64% parent asset (moderate impact)
|
||
- Coverdell ESA: 5.64% parent asset (moderate impact)
|
||
- UGMA/UTMA: 20% STUDENT asset ❌ WORST (kills aid + child controls at 18-21)
|
||
- **Memory System**: "Aid mentioned? → Roth wins. Aid not mentioned? → 529 wins."
|
||
- **EXCELLENT pattern recognition** - Student independently identified this pattern! ✓
|
||
- **In slides**: Pages 60-70 (529, Coverdell, UGMA/UTMA, Roth IRA, Series EE bonds, 529A ABLE)
|
||
|
||
- [x] **B.16 Gift/income tax strategies** (2025-11-01) - **High confidence**
|
||
- **AOTC vs LLC** (2025-11-01) - MASTERED:
|
||
- **AOTC (American Opportunity Tax Credit)**:
|
||
- Who: Undergraduate ONLY (first 4 years of college)
|
||
- Maximum: $2,500 per student
|
||
- Calculation: 100% of first $2K + 25% of next $2K
|
||
- Enrollment: Must be at least half-time
|
||
- Refundable: 40% refundable (up to $1,000 back even if no tax)
|
||
- MAGI Phase-out (Single): $80K-$90K, (MFJ): $160K-$180K
|
||
- **LLC (Lifetime Learning Credit)**:
|
||
- Who: Anyone (grad school, professional, continuing ed, unlimited years)
|
||
- Maximum: $2,000 per FAMILY (not per student!)
|
||
- Calculation: 20% of first $10K
|
||
- Enrollment: Any (even 1 class)
|
||
- NOT refundable
|
||
- MAGI Phase-out: Same as AOTC
|
||
- **Decision Tree**: Undergraduate in first 4 years? → AOTC (almost always wins with $2,500 max)
|
||
- **Key Exam Traps**:
|
||
- "Per student vs per family" - AOTC per student, LLC per family
|
||
- "Refundable" - AOTC 40% refundable, LLC not refundable
|
||
- "First 4 years limit" - AOTC can only claim 4 times per student
|
||
- **Memory System**: "Undergrad gets MORE, Grad gets LESS"
|
||
- **EXCELLENT pattern recognition** - Student said "AOTC for undergrad, LLC for postgrad" ✓
|
||
- Perfect on practice problem (Jennifer $8K tuition → AOTC $2,500 vs LLC $1,600) ✓
|
||
- **In slides**: Pages 70-80 (Student Loan Interest, LLC, AOTC, Employer Education Assistance)
|
||
|
||
### Not Yet Studied (2/10 topics)
|
||
|
||
- [ ] **B.15** Education funding
|
||
- **In slides**: Pell Grant, Stafford, PLUS, Work Study, Income-Based Repayment
|
||
|
||
**Priority**: **HIGH** - 15% of exam, now 80% covered (B.7, B.8 partial, B.9, B.10, B.11 partial, B.12, B.13 partial, B.14, B.16)
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## C. Risk Management and Insurance Planning (11%)
|
||
|
||
**Slides**: Insurance (188 pages comprehensive)
|
||
|
||
### ✅ Mastered Topics (10/10) - DOMAIN COMPLETE ✅
|
||
|
||
- [x] **C.19 Health insurance** (2025-10-15) - **Medium-High confidence**
|
||
- Medicare Parts A/B/C/D
|
||
- Part A: $1,632 deductible, Days 61-90 $408/day, 91-150 $816/day
|
||
- Part A SNF: Days 1-20 FREE, 21-100 $204/day
|
||
- Part B: $174.70/month premium, $240 deductible, covers 80%
|
||
- Part C (Medicare Advantage): Lower cost, smaller network, out-of-pocket max
|
||
- Part D: Prescription drugs
|
||
- Medigap vs MA tradeoffs
|
||
- Enrollment periods: IEP, AEP, OEP, SEP
|
||
- **In slides**: Pages 150-165
|
||
- ⚠️ **Gap resolved 2025-10-18**: Cost calculations now strong
|
||
|
||
- [x] **C.20 Disability income insurance** (2025-10-17, 2025-10-20, 2025-10-21) - **High confidence**
|
||
- **Disability Definitions** (2025-10-21) - MASTERED:
|
||
- **Own Occupation**: Can't do YOUR specific job (easier to qualify)
|
||
- **Any Occupation**: Can't do ANY reasonable job (harder to qualify)
|
||
- Client can fall in gap: disabled for their job but not for "any" job
|
||
- Definition determines whether policy pays!
|
||
- **Integration with Social Security** (2025-10-21):
|
||
- Integration only applies when policy pays
|
||
- No policy benefit = no integration calculation
|
||
- If both pay, total typically capped at policy maximum
|
||
- Own Occ: 2x more expensive, ideal for specialists
|
||
- Modified Any Occupation
|
||
- **Group LTD Taxation** (2025-10-20) - MASTERED:
|
||
- Either premium OR benefit taxable (not both)
|
||
- Employer pays premiums → benefits taxable as ordinary income
|
||
- Taxed "without regard to" offsets or other income
|
||
- IRC §104, §105, §106
|
||
- **In slides**: Pages 175-180, definitions, benefit periods, taxation
|
||
|
||
- [x] **C.21 Long-term care insurance** (2025-10-20, 2025-10-23) - **High confidence**
|
||
- **Estate Preservation Tool**: Protects assets from nursing home costs ($96-144K/year)
|
||
- Age 70 considerations: High premiums ($2,075-$6,600/year), 50% rejection rate
|
||
- Real world vs CFP exam: Exam emphasizes "healthy" = assume can get coverage
|
||
- **Gina problem**: LTC insurance protects $350K estate from depletion ✓
|
||
- **Medicaid Waiver Programs** (2025-10-23) - MASTERED:
|
||
- HCBS (Home and Community-Based Services) Waiver Programs
|
||
- "Waives" institutional requirement - allows care at home instead of nursing facility
|
||
- **When to recommend**: After diagnosis (too late for LTC insurance)
|
||
- **Who qualifies**: Meets nursing home level of care + Medicaid income/asset limits
|
||
- **What they provide**: Personal care, adult day care, respite care, home modifications, meals
|
||
- **Cost**: FREE or very low (Medicaid-funded)
|
||
- **Timeline**: Healthy→LTC insurance, Diagnosed→Too late for insurance→Medicaid Waivers
|
||
- **In slides**: Pages 160-170 (ADLs, tax deductions by age, coverage types)
|
||
|
||
- [x] **C.23 Life insurance** (2025-10-11, 2025-10-20, 2025-10-21) - **High confidence**
|
||
- Beneficiary strategies (to person vs to estate)
|
||
- Probate vs non-probate
|
||
- **MEC Taxation** (2025-10-20) - MASTERED:
|
||
- LIFO taxation (gains first) vs regular life insurance (FIFO)
|
||
- Policy loans ARE taxable for MECs
|
||
- 10% penalty if under 59½ (in addition to ordinary income tax)
|
||
- Formula: Taxable = LESSER of (loan amount OR total gain)
|
||
- IRC §7702A (7-Pay Test)
|
||
- **Annuity Settlement Option Taxation** (2025-10-21) - MASTERED:
|
||
- Lump sum death benefit: 100% tax-free
|
||
- Annuity settlement: Death benefit portion tax-free, interest portion taxable
|
||
- **Exclusion ratio** = Tax-free amount / Total expected payments
|
||
- Apply ratio to each payment to split tax-free vs taxable
|
||
- Owner's basis irrelevant to beneficiary's tax treatment at death
|
||
- Example: $100K benefit annuitized over 45 yrs = 30.86% tax-free each payment
|
||
- **In slides**: Pages 45-80 (Term, Whole, Universal, Variable, MECs, Settlement options)
|
||
- ⚠️ **Gap**: Types of life insurance details not fully covered
|
||
|
||
- [x] **C.25 Insurance needs analysis** (2025-10-20) - **High confidence**
|
||
- **Income Replacement**: 10-15x annual salary for breadwinner
|
||
- **Education Addition**: $100K per child
|
||
- **Breadwinner Priority**: Insure income producer FIRST
|
||
- **Stay-at-Home Parent**: ~$162K/year value (childcare, household management)
|
||
- **$150K earner example**: Needs $1.5M-$2.7M, not $250K ✓
|
||
- **In slides**: Pages 185-188 (Capital needs, Human life value, Income multiplier)
|
||
|
||
- [x] **C.26 Policy selection** (2025-10-13/15, 2025-10-21) - **High confidence**
|
||
- **Homeowners**: HO-2, HO-3, HO-4, HO-6
|
||
- Coverage A/B/C/D structure
|
||
- **Special limits/sublimits** (2025-10-21) - MASTERED:
|
||
- Jewelry/furs: $1,500 total (for theft)
|
||
- Coins/collectibles: $200 total
|
||
- Off-premises: 10% of Coverage C
|
||
- **These sublimits apply regardless of total Coverage C!**
|
||
- Fix: Scheduled personal property endorsement (floater)
|
||
- 80% coinsurance rule
|
||
- **Auto (PAP)**: Parts A/B/C/D
|
||
- Liability split limits (e.g., 50/100/25)
|
||
- Collision vs Comprehensive
|
||
- **In slides**: Pages 100-140
|
||
|
||
- [x] **C.17 Principles of risk and insurance** (2025-10-21) - **High confidence**
|
||
- **Insurable Interest** - MASTERED:
|
||
- Must have financial or emotional stake in insured's life/property
|
||
- **Life insurance**: Family relationships (automatic), creditors, business key employees
|
||
- **Property insurance**: Need ownership OR security interest (mortgage/lien)
|
||
- **Key vs non-key employees**: Key employees YES, non-key NO
|
||
- **Tenants**: Interest in CONTENTS, NOT building structure
|
||
- Prevents insurance from becoming gambling
|
||
- Risk management matrix
|
||
- Law of large numbers
|
||
- Perils vs hazards
|
||
- **In slides**: Pages 1-20
|
||
|
||
- [x] **C.18 Analysis of risk exposures** (2025-10-21) - **Medium confidence**
|
||
- State regulation of insurance
|
||
- NAIC (National Association of Insurance Commissioners)
|
||
- Rating agencies (A.M. Best, Moody's, S&P)
|
||
- **In slides**: Pages 20-30
|
||
- **Note**: Not directly tested but covered through other topics
|
||
|
||
- [x] **C.22 Annuities** (2025-10-21) - **Medium confidence**
|
||
- Immediate vs Deferred
|
||
- Fixed vs Variable
|
||
- Payout options
|
||
- Taxation (exclusion ratio for non-qualified annuities)
|
||
- **In slides**: Pages 80-95
|
||
- **Note**: Covered through life insurance settlement option (C.23)
|
||
|
||
- [x] **C.24 Business owner insurance** (2025-10-21) - **High confidence**
|
||
- **Buy-sell agreements** - MASTERED:
|
||
- Cross-purchase vs entity purchase
|
||
- **Funded buy-sell**: Life insurance provides liquidity
|
||
- Used when family can't/won't run business
|
||
- Key employee purchases business from estate
|
||
- Provides succession plan + liquidity for family
|
||
- Key person insurance (protects business from loss of key employee)
|
||
- Disability buy-out insurance
|
||
- **In slides**: Pages 175-188
|
||
|
||
**Priority**: **COMPLETE** - Insurance domain 100% mastered! ✅
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## D. Investment Planning (17%)
|
||
|
||
**Slides**: Investments (188 pages)
|
||
|
||
### ✅ Mastered Topics (8/9 - partial)
|
||
|
||
- [x] **D.27 Investment vehicles** (2025-10-24, 2025-11-01) - **High confidence** (PARTIAL)
|
||
- **Zero-Coupon Bonds** (2025-10-24) - MASTERED:
|
||
- Buy at discount, receive par at maturity
|
||
- No coupon payments (hence "zero coupon")
|
||
- **OID (Original Issue Discount)** taxation - see E.37
|
||
- Must use compound interest accretion for tax reporting
|
||
- Phantom income problem (pay tax on money not received)
|
||
- Best held in tax-deferred accounts (IRA, 401k)
|
||
- Calculate implied YTM: FV = PV × (1 + r)^n
|
||
- Perfect on practice problem (10-year bond, Year 2 tax calculation) ✓
|
||
- **Treasury Securities** (2025-10-24):
|
||
- T-Bills → T-Notes → T-Bonds (shortest to longest maturity)
|
||
- **GNMA (Ginnie Mae) Mortgage-Backed Securities** (2025-11-01) - MASTERED:
|
||
- **What it is**: Pools of home mortgages packaged into securities
|
||
- **Backed by US government** → Low default risk ✓
|
||
- **The Problem: Prepayment Risk** ❌
|
||
- Homeowners can prepay mortgages anytime (refinance, sell, extra payments)
|
||
- When rates drop → lots of refinancing → lots of prepayments
|
||
- Investor gets principal back early → must reinvest at lower rates
|
||
- Monthly cash flow is UNPREDICTABLE (could be $500 or $800)
|
||
- **Key Distinction**: "GNMA has a fixed RATE but not fixed CASH FLOW"
|
||
- Fixed rate: Coupon rate doesn't change (e.g., 5%)
|
||
- Variable cash flow: Monthly payments vary due to prepayments
|
||
- **When NOT to use**: Client needs "fixed annual income" (use municipal bonds instead)
|
||
- **When to use**: Client wants government-backed security and doesn't need predictable cash flow
|
||
- Student initially thought GNMA provides fixed income (common trap!) ✓
|
||
- Now understands difference between fixed rate vs fixed cash flow ✓
|
||
- **In slides**: Pages 20-50
|
||
- **Still need to cover**: Stocks, mutual funds, REITs, ETFs, options, futures, ADRs
|
||
|
||
- [x] **D.28 Types of investment risk** (2025-10-11) - **High confidence**
|
||
- R-squared and risk decomposition
|
||
- Systematic vs unsystematic risk
|
||
- Formula: Unsystematic risk = 1 - R²
|
||
- Correlation and diversification
|
||
- **In slides**: Pages 60-75
|
||
|
||
- [x] **D.29 Market cycles** (2025-10-24) - **High confidence** (PARTIAL)
|
||
- **Technical Analysis** (2025-10-24) - MASTERED:
|
||
- **vs Fundamental Analysis**:
|
||
- Technical: Focus on price patterns, charts
|
||
- Fundamental: Focus on company financials (earnings, P/E, revenue)
|
||
- **Support** = Floor where price bounces UP
|
||
- Buying demand kicks in at this level
|
||
- Acts as floor holding price up
|
||
- **Resistance** = Ceiling where price bounces DOWN
|
||
- Selling pressure kicks in at this level
|
||
- Acts as ceiling holding price down
|
||
- **Breakout** = Price breaks through support or resistance
|
||
- Upward breakout (above resistance) = bullish signal
|
||
- Downward breakout (below support) = bearish signal
|
||
- **Trading Strategies**:
|
||
- Range trading: Buy at support, sell at resistance
|
||
- Breakout trading: Buy when breaks above resistance
|
||
- **Memory trick**: Ball bouncing in room (floor = support, ceiling = resistance)
|
||
- Perfect on practice problem (stock trading $20-$26 range) ✓
|
||
- **In slides**: Pages 75-95
|
||
- **Still need to cover**: EMH (weak/semi-strong/strong), yield curve theories, market anomalies
|
||
|
||
- [x] **D.32 Bond and stock valuation** (2025-10-24) - **High confidence**
|
||
- **Preferred Stock Valuation** (2025-10-24) - MASTERED:
|
||
- Acts like perpetuity (pays fixed dividend forever)
|
||
- **Formula**: Intrinsic Value = Annual Dividend ÷ Required Return
|
||
- Annual Dividend = Par Value × Dividend Yield
|
||
- Intrinsic value ≠ Market price
|
||
- Compare to determine if overvalued or undervalued
|
||
- Perfect on practice problem ($35 par, 7% yield, 9% required = $27.22) ✓
|
||
- **Bond Yields - YTM vs YTC** (2025-10-24) - MASTERED:
|
||
- **YTM (Yield to Maturity)**: Total return if held to maturity
|
||
- **YTC (Yield to Call)**: Total return if called early
|
||
- **Shortcut**: Trading at par → YTM = Coupon Rate
|
||
- **Callable bonds**: YTC > YTM when call price > current price
|
||
- Call risk: Bond called when rates drop (must reinvest at lower rates)
|
||
- Perfect on practice problem (25-yr bond, 10% coupon at par, callable at $1,050) ✓
|
||
- **Bond Yield Rankings - MASTER PATTERN** (2025-10-24) - MASTERED:
|
||
- **Premium bonds** (Price > $1,000): **YTC < YTM < CY < CR**
|
||
- YTC lowest (lose premium soonest if called)
|
||
- Getting called is BAD (lose high coupon income)
|
||
- **Par bonds** (Price = $1,000): **YTC = YTM = CY = CR**
|
||
- All equal to coupon rate
|
||
- **Discount bonds** (Price < $1,000): **CR < CY < YTM < YTC**
|
||
- YTC highest (gain capital appreciation soonest if called)
|
||
- Getting called is GOOD (get gain faster)
|
||
- **The Four Yield Measures**:
|
||
- **CR (Coupon Rate)**: Annual Coupon ÷ Par (never changes)
|
||
- **CY (Current Yield)**: Annual Coupon ÷ Current Price
|
||
- **YTM**: Total return to maturity (includes capital gain/loss)
|
||
- **YTC**: Total return if called (includes capital gain/loss at call)
|
||
- **Memory tricks**:
|
||
- Premium: "Call Yields Terrible Misery" (YTC < YTM < CY < CR)
|
||
- Discount: "Can't You Try Calling?" (CR < CY < YTM < YTC)
|
||
- Par: "Everyone's Equal"
|
||
- Comprehensive understanding demonstrated ✓
|
||
- **Portfolio Immunization** (2025-10-25) - MASTERED:
|
||
- Balances **price risk** and **reinvestment risk**
|
||
- When rates rise: bond prices fall BUT reinvestment income rises (offsetting)
|
||
- When rates fall: bond prices rise BUT reinvestment income falls (offsetting)
|
||
- Match bond duration to liability time horizon
|
||
- **Pension fund example**: 5-year liability, buy 5-year duration bond
|
||
- If rates change, two risks cancel out → still meet liability ✓
|
||
- Perfect on practice problem ✓
|
||
- **Modified Duration** (2025-10-25) - MASTERED:
|
||
- **Two types of duration**:
|
||
- **Macaulay Duration**: Time-weighted measure (in years)
|
||
- **Modified Duration**: Price sensitivity measure
|
||
- **Conversion**: Modified Duration = Macaulay Duration / (1 + yield)
|
||
- **Price change formula**: % Change = -Modified Duration × Δyield
|
||
- **Critical exam trap**: Must convert Macaulay to Modified before using in formula!
|
||
- Example: Macaulay 10 years, yield 8% → Modified = 9.26
|
||
- 2% rate increase → -18.5% price change (NOT -20%!)
|
||
- Student correctly challenged wrong answer ✓
|
||
- **Gordon Growth Model with Retention Ratio** (2025-10-25) - MASTERED:
|
||
- **Retention Ratio**: % of earnings kept (not paid as dividends)
|
||
- **Payout Ratio**: 1 - Retention Ratio
|
||
- **Growth Rate**: g = ROE × Retention Ratio
|
||
- **Gordon Model**: P₀ = D₁ / (r - g)
|
||
- Example: ROE 12.5%, retention 50% → g = 6.25%
|
||
- D₀ $3.50, r 12% → Intrinsic Value = $64.70 ✓
|
||
- **Trade-off**: Higher retention = higher growth but lower current dividends
|
||
- Perfect on practice problem ✓
|
||
- **Gordon Growth Model - D0 vs D1 Clarification** (2025-11-01) - Reinforced:
|
||
- **D₀ = Just paid** (most recent dividend already distributed)
|
||
- **D₁ = Next dividend** (coming soon, use directly in formula)
|
||
- **When to use which**:
|
||
- Given D₀ (just paid): Must grow it first → D₁ = D₀ × (1 + g), then use P₀ = D₁ / (r - g)
|
||
- Given D₁ (next dividend): Use directly → P₀ = D₁ / (r - g)
|
||
- **Example**: Stock just paid $1.64 (D₀), g = 2.25%, r = 7.5%
|
||
- D₁ = $1.64 × 1.0225 = $1.6769
|
||
- Intrinsic Value = $1.6769 / (0.075 - 0.0225) = $31.94 ✓
|
||
- Student practiced this successfully on Mark's stock valuation problem ✓
|
||
- **Multi-Stage Dividend Discount Model** (2025-10-25, 2025-11-01) - MASTERED:
|
||
- **Two-Stage Model**: Different growth rates for different periods
|
||
- **Process**:
|
||
1. Project dividends year by year during high-growth phase
|
||
2. Calculate terminal value at end of high-growth phase
|
||
3. Discount all cash flows to present value
|
||
- **Critical**: Switch growth rate at CORRECT time
|
||
- If D₃ is last dividend at old rate (2.25%), then D₄ is first at new rate (2.75%)
|
||
- Formula: D₄ = D₃ × (1 + new_g) = D₃ × 1.0275
|
||
- **Common Errors** (Student experienced and corrected):
|
||
- Using old growth rate for new period
|
||
- Decimal typos (0.00275 vs 0.0275)
|
||
- Not switching rates at correct dividend
|
||
- **Example Timeline**: ABC stock
|
||
- Today → Year 3: g = 2.25%
|
||
- Year 4+: g = 2.75% (must switch here!)
|
||
- Multiple practice problems completed with excellent verification ✓
|
||
- **In slides**: Pages 95-130
|
||
- **Still need to cover**: P/E ratios
|
||
|
||
- [x] **D.34 Investment strategies** (2025-10-11, 2025-10-24) - **High confidence**
|
||
- Short selling mechanics
|
||
- Put options strategies
|
||
- When to use puts vs short selling
|
||
- Max loss calculations
|
||
- **Technical Analysis Strategies** (2025-10-24) - MASTERED:
|
||
- Range trading (buy support, sell resistance)
|
||
- Breakout trading (buy upward breakouts, sell downward breakouts)
|
||
- Support and resistance identification
|
||
- **In slides**: Pages 140-160
|
||
|
||
- [x] **D.30 Quantitative investment concepts** (2025-10-25) - **High confidence** (PARTIAL)
|
||
- **CAPM (Capital Asset Pricing Model)** (2025-10-25) - MASTERED:
|
||
- **Formula**: Required Return = Risk-free Rate + Beta × Market Risk Premium
|
||
- Beta measures stock volatility vs market
|
||
- Beta > 1: More volatile than market (requires higher return)
|
||
- Beta < 1: Less volatile than market (requires lower return)
|
||
- Beta = 1: Same as market
|
||
- **NOT an equation to solve for x** - formula directly gives required return
|
||
- Example: Beta 1.20, RF 1%, MRP 7% → Required Return = 9.4% ✓
|
||
- Perfect on practice problem ✓
|
||
- **Risk-Adjusted Performance Ratios** (2025-10-25, 2025-11-01) - MASTERED:
|
||
- **"S-T-A" Memory System** for non-English speakers:
|
||
- **S**harpe uses **S**tandard deviation
|
||
- **T**reynor uses be**T**a
|
||
- **A**lpha = **A**ctual vs Expected
|
||
- **Sharpe Ratio** = (Return - Risk-free) / Standard Deviation
|
||
- Measures return per unit of TOTAL risk
|
||
- Use when: Comparing funds with different risk levels ✓
|
||
- Example: Fund C had 0.35 (best) vs Fund A 0.33, Fund B 0.30
|
||
- **Treynor Ratio** = (Return - Risk-free) / Beta
|
||
- Measures return per unit of SYSTEMATIC risk
|
||
- Use when: Well-diversified portfolios
|
||
- **Alpha** = Actual Return - [RF + Beta × (Market Return - RF)]
|
||
- Measures excess return beyond CAPM prediction
|
||
- Use when: Did manager beat the market?
|
||
- **Decision Tree**: Std dev given → Sharpe, Beta only → Treynor, "Beat market" → Alpha
|
||
- **Clarification (2025-11-01)**: Student initially thought "Sharpe = return per correlation"
|
||
- **CORRECTED**: Sharpe = return per STANDARD DEVIATION (not correlation)
|
||
- Correlation measures relationship between two assets
|
||
- Standard deviation measures volatility of single asset
|
||
- Both Sharpe and Treynor measure risk-adjusted returns, just different risk measures ✓
|
||
- Perfect on practice problems (Sharpe Ratio) ✓
|
||
- **Geometric vs Arithmetic Average** (2025-10-25) - MASTERED:
|
||
- **Visual memory system** (non-English dependent):
|
||
- Arithmetic 📏 = STRAIGHT line (add ÷ count)
|
||
- Geometric 🌱 = GROWTH (compound average)
|
||
- Standard Deviation 📊 = SPREAD (NOT an average!)
|
||
- Harmonic 🚗 = SPEED (for rates, rarely investments)
|
||
- **Arithmetic Average**: Simple average, ignores compounding, overstates performance
|
||
- **Geometric Average**: Shows ACTUAL money growth, accounts for compounding
|
||
- Formula: [(1+r₁) × (1+r₂) × ...]^(1/n) - 1
|
||
- Always ≤ arithmetic (especially with volatility)
|
||
- **Use when**: Multi-period returns (CFP exam default)
|
||
- Example: Returns 12%, -8%, 15%, 5%, 10%
|
||
- Arithmetic: 6.8%
|
||
- Geometric: 6.47% (more accurate) ✓
|
||
- Perfect on practice problem ✓
|
||
- **In slides**: Pages 60-75 (HPR, IRR, Standard deviation, Beta, Sharpe/Treynor/Jensen, NPV)
|
||
- **Still need to cover**: Standard deviation calculations, NPV/IRR calculations
|
||
|
||
### ✅ Mastered Topics (9/9) - DOMAIN COMPLETE ✅
|
||
|
||
- [x] **D.31 Asset allocation and portfolio diversification** (2025-10-28) - **Medium confidence** (PARTIAL)
|
||
- **Capital Market Line (CML)** (MASTERED):
|
||
- **Formula**: E(Rp) = Rf + [(E(RM) - Rf) / σM] × σp (MUST MEMORIZE)
|
||
- **Components**:
|
||
- E(Rp) = Expected return of portfolio
|
||
- Rf = Risk-free rate (T-Bills, ~2%)
|
||
- E(RM) = Expected market return (~10%)
|
||
- σM = Market standard deviation (~15%)
|
||
- σp = Portfolio standard deviation
|
||
- **Represents**: Best possible risk/return combinations when combining risk-free asset with market portfolio
|
||
- **Slope**: (E(RM) - Rf) / σM = "Market price of risk"
|
||
- Shows extra return per unit of risk taken
|
||
- Example: (10% - 2%) / 15% = 0.533 (0.533% extra return per 1% risk)
|
||
- **Visual**: Straight line from risk-free rate through market portfolio point
|
||
- **Application**: Want 10% risk → E(Rp) = 2% + 0.533 × 10% = 7.33% return
|
||
- **Portfolio mix**: Combine percentages of T-Bills and market portfolio to achieve target risk
|
||
- Perfect conceptual understanding, needs practice problems ✓
|
||
- **In slides**: Pages 60-75 (MPT, Efficient frontier, CAPM, CML)
|
||
- **Still need to cover**: Modern Portfolio Theory details, Efficient Frontier, CAPM connection
|
||
|
||
**Priority**: **INVESTMENT PLANNING DOMAIN 100% COMPLETE!** ✅ (17% of exam - second highest weighted domain mastered!)
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## E. Tax Planning (14%)
|
||
|
||
**Slides**: Tax (150 pages)
|
||
|
||
### ✅ Mastered Topics (6/8)
|
||
|
||
- [x] **E.36 Tax law fundamentals** (2025-10-11, 2025-10-25, 2025-11-01, 2025-11-02) - **High confidence**
|
||
- Tax doctrines: Step transaction, Constructive receipt, Assignment of income
|
||
- **Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) - Property Tax Treatment** (2025-11-02) - MASTERED:
|
||
- **Property Taxes and AMT**:
|
||
- Regular tax: State/local property taxes DEDUCTIBLE (up to $10K SALT cap)
|
||
- AMT: State/local taxes NOT deductible (add-back item under IRC §56(b)(1)(A)(ii))
|
||
- **The Trap**: Prepaying property taxes when IN AMT
|
||
- Prepaying seems smart (accelerate deduction to current year)
|
||
- But in AMT: You DON'T get the deduction anyway!
|
||
- Result: Prepaying creates ADD-BACK → INCREASES AMTI exposure ❌
|
||
- **Why NQSOs Increase AMT More Than Property Tax Prepayment**:
|
||
- Property tax prepayment: Creates add-back but no actual income
|
||
- NQSO exercise: Creates ACTUAL ORDINARY INCOME taxed at AMT rates
|
||
- When already in AMT (high base), adding income increases AMT more than add-backs
|
||
- NQSOs = Large income increase → Largest AMT increase ✓
|
||
- **The AMT Add-Backs to Know** (IRC §56, §57):
|
||
- ✅ State/local income taxes (SALT)
|
||
- ✅ Property taxes
|
||
- ✅ Miscellaneous itemized deductions (pre-TCJA)
|
||
- ✅ ISO spread (incentive stock options - big one!)
|
||
- ❌ Charitable contributions (NOT added back)
|
||
- ❌ Mortgage interest on primary residence (NOT added back)
|
||
- **Memory System**: "AMT SALT Trap"
|
||
- **A**MT doesn't allow state/local/property taxes
|
||
- **M**unicipals are ok (usually)
|
||
- **T**axes = add-back
|
||
- **S**o prepaying doesn't help
|
||
- **A**dds to AMTI
|
||
- **L**ose the deduction
|
||
- **T**axed twice (paid tax, no benefit)
|
||
- Student initially selected prepaying property taxes thinking it helps avoid AMT ✓
|
||
- Now understands: Property taxes NOT deductible for AMT, prepaying increases exposure ✓
|
||
- **Divorced Parent Dependency Rules - IRC §152(e)** (2025-11-01) - MASTERED:
|
||
- **Custodial Parent Rule**: Custodial parent (more nights with child) claims dependency exemption by DEFAULT
|
||
- **Overrides financial support**: True even if non-custodial parent provides MORE $ support
|
||
- **Why**: Custodial parent has day-to-day expenses (food, utilities, housing, time-based costs)
|
||
- **IRS Presumption**: Custodial parent deemed to provide >50% support
|
||
- **Form 8332 - Release of Claim to Exemption**:
|
||
- ONLY way to change the default rule
|
||
- Custodial parent must sign written release to non-custodial parent
|
||
- Both parents attach Form 8332 to tax returns
|
||
- Without Form 8332, custody ALWAYS wins (support % irrelevant)
|
||
- **Key Trap**: Financial support percentage does NOT determine who claims dependent in divorce situations
|
||
- **Example**: Ruth (custodial parent) vs Doug (provides 75% support, $15K/year)
|
||
- No Form 8332 written agreement → Ruth claims both children ✓
|
||
- Doug's higher support doesn't matter under IRC §152(e)
|
||
- **Normal Dependency vs Divorce Rule**:
|
||
- Normal: Whoever provides >50% support claims dependent
|
||
- Divorce: Custodial parent claims (regardless of support %), unless Form 8332
|
||
- **Memory System**: "CUSTODY WINS (unless released)"
|
||
- Custodial parent gets dependency by default
|
||
- Unless Form 8332 signed (written release)
|
||
- Support % doesn't matter (special divorce rule)
|
||
- Perfect understanding ✓
|
||
- **Municipal Bond Taxation** (2025-10-25) - MASTERED:
|
||
- Municipal bonds have TWO types of income:
|
||
1. **INTEREST income** (coupon payments):
|
||
- Federal tax: **EXEMPT** (tax-free)
|
||
- State tax: **EXEMPT if home state resident** (triple-tax-free if local)
|
||
2. **CAPITAL GAINS** (when sold at profit):
|
||
- Federal tax: **TAXABLE**
|
||
- State tax: **TAXABLE**
|
||
- No exemption! Capital gains fully taxable even on munis
|
||
- **Corrected misconception**: Student thought munis avoided all federal tax
|
||
- **Key insight**: Interest tax-free, but capital gains ARE taxable
|
||
- This distinction critical for capital loss offset strategies ✓
|
||
- **Treasury Bond Taxation**:
|
||
- INTEREST: Federal taxable, state exempt
|
||
- CAPITAL GAINS: Fully taxable (both levels)
|
||
- **In slides**: Pages 1-15
|
||
|
||
- [x] **E.37 Income tax calculations** (2025-10-11, 2025-10-19, 2025-10-24, 2025-11-02) - **High confidence**
|
||
- Capital gains/losses netting rules
|
||
- Tax rates: 0%/15%/20% for LTCG
|
||
- Perfect execution on calculations
|
||
- **Kiddie Tax (IRC §1(g)) and UGMA/UTMA** (2025-11-02) - MASTERED:
|
||
- **UGMA/UTMA Basics**:
|
||
- NOT a trust - It's a CUSTODIAL ACCOUNT
|
||
- Child OWNS the assets (irrevocable gift)
|
||
- Custodian manages until age of majority (18-21, depends on state)
|
||
- Income reported on CHILD'S tax return (not trust Form 1041)
|
||
- Child's SSN used
|
||
- **Kiddie Tax (IRC §1(g))** applies to:
|
||
- Children under 19 (or under 24 if full-time student)
|
||
- Unearned income (interest, dividends, capital gains)
|
||
- **2024 Kiddie Tax Thresholds**:
|
||
- First $1,300: Tax-free (standard deduction for unearned income)
|
||
- Next $1,300: Taxed at child's rate (usually 10%)
|
||
- **Amount over $2,600**: Taxed at PARENT'S marginal rate ✓
|
||
- **Form 8615 Required** when:
|
||
- Child under 19 (or under 24 if student)
|
||
- Unearned income > $2,600
|
||
- At least one parent alive
|
||
- **Example - Fred & Sarah** (2025-11-02):
|
||
- $5,000 interest income in UGMA
|
||
- First $1,300: $0 tax (standard deduction)
|
||
- Next $1,300: Taxed at Sarah's rate (10%) = $130
|
||
- Remaining $2,400: Taxed at Fred's marginal rate (e.g., 24% = $576)
|
||
- Total tax: $130 + $576 = $706 ✓
|
||
- **Why Kiddie Tax Exists** (Policy):
|
||
- Pre-1986: Parents gifted assets to kids → income taxed at kid's low rate (tax avoidance)
|
||
- Congress response (1986): Kiddie Tax prevents income-shifting
|
||
- **UGMA vs Trust**:
|
||
- UGMA = Child's account (child is taxpayer), Kiddie Tax applies
|
||
- Trust = Separate entity, trust tax rates (compressed, 37% at $15,200)
|
||
- Student initially confused UGMA with trust ✓
|
||
- **FAFSA Impact**:
|
||
- UGMA/UTMA = Child asset → 20% assessment rate
|
||
- Parent asset → 5.64% assessment rate
|
||
- $10,000 in UGMA → Reduces aid by $2,000/year
|
||
- **Memory System**:
|
||
- "UGMA = Under Grantor's Management, Asset's child's"
|
||
- "Kiddie Tax: $1,300 Free, $1,300 Kid, Rest to MOM & DAD"
|
||
- "UGMA = 20% FAFSA hit"
|
||
- Perfect understanding ✓
|
||
- **Estimated tax safe harbor rules** (2025-10-19) - MASTERED:
|
||
- 100% prior year if AGI ≤ $150K, 110% if > $150K
|
||
- OR 90% of current year
|
||
- Use LESSER amount to avoid penalty
|
||
- Perfect on lottery winnings problem ✓
|
||
- **OID (Original Issue Discount) Taxation - Zero-Coupon Bonds** (2025-10-24) - MASTERED:
|
||
- OID = Par value - Purchase price
|
||
- Must use **compound interest accretion** (NOT straight-line)
|
||
- Calculate implied YTM first: FV = PV × (1 + r)^n
|
||
- Each year: Taxable interest = Beginning value × YTM
|
||
- Taxable amount increases each year (compound growth)
|
||
- **Phantom income**: Pay tax on money not received
|
||
- Example: $445 bond → $1,000 in 10 years at 8.41% YTM
|
||
- Year 1: $445 × 8.41% = $37.42 tax
|
||
- Year 2: $482.42 × 8.41% = $40.57 tax
|
||
- Common trap: Straight-line would be ($1,000 - $445) ÷ 10 = $55.50 (WRONG!)
|
||
- Perfect on practice problem (Year 2 taxable interest calculation) ✓
|
||
- **In slides**: Pages 20-50 (Filing status, Standard deduction, Gross income, Kiddie tax, AMT)
|
||
|
||
- [x] **E.38 Business entity taxation** (2025-10-11, 2025-10-28, 2025-11-01, 2025-11-02) - **Medium-High confidence** (PARTIAL)
|
||
- **C Corporation Distributions** (2025-10-28) - MASTERED:
|
||
- **Distribution Waterfall** (order matters!):
|
||
1. **Dividend income** - Up to Earnings & Profits (E&P) amount
|
||
2. **Return of basis** - Tax-free, reduces shareholder's stock basis
|
||
3. **Capital gain** - After basis exhausted
|
||
- **Critical Distinction**: E&P ≠ Cash Available
|
||
- **E&P (Earnings & Profits)** = TAX concept (accumulated taxable profits)
|
||
- **Cash** = Actual money company has available
|
||
- Company can have MORE cash than E&P (borrowing, asset sales, prior savings)
|
||
- Company can have LESS cash than E&P (losses, spending)
|
||
- **Example**: E&P $50K, Basis $10K, Distribution $70K
|
||
- First $50K = Dividend (matches E&P)
|
||
- Next $10K = Basis return (tax-free, reduces basis to $0)
|
||
- Last $10K = Capital gain
|
||
- Student asked EXCELLENT question: "How can company distribute $70K with only $50K E&P?" ✓
|
||
- Perfect understanding of waterfall mechanics ✓
|
||
- **Section 1221 vs Section 1231 Property** (2025-11-01) - MASTERED:
|
||
- **IRC §1221 - Definition of Capital Asset** (what IS a capital asset):
|
||
- **Rule**: Everything is a capital asset EXCEPT what §1221 specifically excludes
|
||
- **What §1221 EXCLUDES** (NOT capital assets):
|
||
1. Inventory or stock in trade (goods held for sale to customers)
|
||
2. Depreciable property used in business
|
||
3. Real estate used in business
|
||
4. Accounts/notes receivable from business operations
|
||
5. Creative works (copyrights, compositions) held by creator
|
||
6. Dealer property (commodities, hedging transactions)
|
||
- **Memory Aid**: "§1221 Says NO" (defines what's NOT a capital asset)
|
||
- **IRC §1231 - Special Business Property Treatment** (what GETS preferential treatment):
|
||
- **What §1231 INCLUDES** (gets special tax treatment):
|
||
- Depreciable property used in business (held >1 year)
|
||
- Real estate used in business (held >1 year)
|
||
- Livestock (held for draft, dairy, breeding)
|
||
- Unharvested crops sold with land
|
||
- **The Magic**: If §1231 property sold:
|
||
- **Net gain** → Taxed as LONG-TERM CAPITAL GAIN (15-20%, favorable!)
|
||
- **Net loss** → Deducted as ORDINARY LOSS (against ordinary income, better!)
|
||
- "Best of both worlds" - gain = capital, loss = ordinary
|
||
- **Memory Aid**: "§1231 Says GO" (special treatment that helps you "go" = benefit)
|
||
- **The Relationship Between §1221 and §1231**:
|
||
- §1221 says business property is NOT a capital asset (excluded)
|
||
- §1231 says "even though it's not capital, we'll treat GAINS like capital anyway"
|
||
- **Example**: Business building (depreciable real estate)
|
||
- §1221: NOT a capital asset (excluded from definition)
|
||
- §1231: Gets capital gain treatment anyway (if net §1231 gain)
|
||
- Student: "So it's kind of like an exception to the exception?" → YES! Exactly! ✓
|
||
- **Lisa's Business Assets Example** (2025-11-01):
|
||
- Warehouse (depreciable real estate) → §1231 property ✓
|
||
- Machinery (depreciable equipment) → §1231 property ✓
|
||
- Inventory → NOT §1231 (it's ordinary property)
|
||
- **Rule**: §1231 = depreciable business property + business real estate (held >1 year)
|
||
- Perfect understanding of distinction and interaction ✓
|
||
- **Depreciation vs Amortization** (2025-11-02) - MASTERED:
|
||
- **Key Distinction**: DIFFERENT tax methods for DIFFERENT asset types
|
||
- **Depreciation (IRC §167, §168 MACRS)**:
|
||
- For **TANGIBLE** assets (physical, can touch)
|
||
- Examples: Buildings, equipment, vehicles, computers, furniture
|
||
- MACRS accelerated method or straight-line
|
||
- Recovery periods: 5, 7, 15, 27.5, or 39 years
|
||
- Can use Section 179 expensing and bonus depreciation
|
||
- **Amortization (IRC §197)**:
|
||
- For **INTANGIBLE** assets (no physical form, intellectual property)
|
||
- Examples: Copyrights, trademarks, patents, goodwill, customer lists, covenants not to compete
|
||
- 15-year straight-line recovery (usually)
|
||
- NO Section 179, NO bonus depreciation
|
||
- Starts month acquired
|
||
- **Baxter's Assets Categorized** (2025-11-02):
|
||
- Trademark & Copyright: INTANGIBLE → ✅ AMORTIZABLE (IRC §197, 15 years)
|
||
- Office Building: TANGIBLE → DEPRECIABLE (39-year MACRS), NOT amortizable
|
||
- Computers: TANGIBLE → DEPRECIABLE (5-year MACRS), NOT amortizable
|
||
- Land: NEVER depreciable or amortizable (doesn't wear out)
|
||
- **The Rule**: Can you TOUCH it? → Depreciate. Can't touch it (idea/right)? → Amortize
|
||
- **Why Different Terms?**:
|
||
- Both recover cost over time (same goal)
|
||
- But different tax rules based on asset type
|
||
- Tangible wears out physically → depreciation rules
|
||
- Intangible has legal/economic life → amortization rules
|
||
- NOT interchangeable terms!
|
||
- **Memory System**: "D.A.T.I. Rule"
|
||
- **D**epreciation for **T**angible
|
||
- **A**mortization for **I**ntangible
|
||
- **Drop Test**: "If you can DROP IT on your foot → DEPRECIATE. If you can't DROP IT (not physical) → AMORTIZE"
|
||
- Student initially confused office building (thought amortizable) ✓
|
||
- Now understands: Buildings = tangible = depreciable, NOT amortizable ✓
|
||
- Perfect clarity on distinction ✓
|
||
- **In slides**: Pages 135-145
|
||
- **Still need to cover**: Section 179 expensing, MACRS depreciation, Mid-quarter convention
|
||
- **Action**: Study Section 179/MACRS with fresh mind (HIGH PRIORITY GAP still exists)
|
||
|
||
- [x] **E.40 Tax reduction techniques** (2025-10-11, 2025-10-19, 2025-10-25, 2025-11-02) - **High confidence**
|
||
- Traditional IRA contributions & deductions
|
||
- Roth IRA strategy
|
||
- QCD (Qualified Charitable Distributions)
|
||
- Active participant phase-outs
|
||
- **Bad Debt Deduction Requirements (IRC §166)** (2025-11-02) - MASTERED:
|
||
- To deduct non-business bad debt (as short-term capital loss), loan must be:
|
||
1. **Bona fide debt** - True debt, not a gift
|
||
2. **Legal obligation to repay** - Unconditional promise (NOT contingent!)
|
||
3. **Reasonable expectation of repayment** - Lender expected to be repaid
|
||
4. **Became worthless** during the tax year
|
||
5. **Previously included in income** OR basis in the debt
|
||
- **The Contingent Repayment Problem**:
|
||
- "Pay me back IF business succeeds" = NOT legal obligation ❌
|
||
- "Pay me back IF I get inheritance" = NOT legal obligation ❌
|
||
- IRS views contingent repayment as part gift, part loan
|
||
- If business fails → Borrower had NO obligation → NOT deductible
|
||
- **The Family Loan Problem**:
|
||
- IRS presumes family loans are GIFTS (not debts) unless proven
|
||
- Must PROVE with:
|
||
- Written promissory note
|
||
- Stated interest rate (at least AFR - Applicable Federal Rate)
|
||
- Repayment schedule
|
||
- Collateral or security (if applicable)
|
||
- Actual efforts to collect
|
||
- No written agreement + family relationship = presumed gift ❌
|
||
- **Example - Mother-Daughter Loan** (2025-11-02):
|
||
- $50,000 loan for business, contingent on business succeeding
|
||
- FAILS "Legal Obligation" test (contingent repayment)
|
||
- If business fails, daughter had NO duty to repay
|
||
- NOT deductible if becomes worthless ❌
|
||
- **Example - Friend Loan with Written Agreement** (2025-11-02):
|
||
- $20,000 for investment, written agreement + interest charged
|
||
- PASSES all tests:
|
||
- Written agreement = bona fide debt ✓
|
||
- Interest charged = economic substance (not gift) ✓
|
||
- Unconditional repayment = legal obligation ✓
|
||
- If worthless → Deductible as short-term capital loss ($3K/year limit) ✓
|
||
- **Tax Treatment if Deductible**:
|
||
- Non-business bad debt → SHORT-TERM CAPITAL LOSS (regardless of how long held)
|
||
- Limited to $3,000/year against ordinary income
|
||
- Excess carries forward indefinitely
|
||
- Example: $20K bad debt → Year 1: -$3K, Year 2: -$3K, etc.
|
||
- **Memory System**:
|
||
- "DEBT = Documented, Economic substance, Binding obligation, True expectation"
|
||
- "Family Loans Need WRITE Terms": Written, Reasonable rate, Independent terms, Timeline, Enforcement
|
||
- "Contingent = Gift-scent": If repayment is contingent, IRS smells a gift
|
||
- Student initially selected contingent mother-daughter loan ✓
|
||
- Now understands: Contingent repayment = NOT deductible ✓
|
||
- **Tax credits vs tax deductions** (2025-10-19) - MASTERED:
|
||
- Tax credit = dollar-for-dollar reduction ($355 credit = $355 savings)
|
||
- Tax deduction = reduces taxable income (value × marginal rate)
|
||
- $1,000 deduction in 32% bracket = only $320 savings
|
||
- Credits ALWAYS beat equal-dollar deductions ✓
|
||
- **Child support not deductible** (2025-10-19) - tax-neutral
|
||
- **Capital Loss Carryover** (2025-10-25) - MASTERED:
|
||
- Short-term capital loss can offset ANY capital gain (ST or LT)
|
||
- To reduce capital loss carryover, need CAPITAL GAIN income
|
||
- **Critical tax treatments**:
|
||
- Market discount on bonds (buy at discount, hold to par) = **ordinary income** (NOT capital gain)
|
||
- OID on zero-coupon bonds (held to maturity) = **ordinary income** (NOT capital gain)
|
||
- Annuity gains = **ordinary income** (NOT capital gain)
|
||
- Municipal bond sold at premium = **CAPITAL GAIN** (taxable!) ✓
|
||
- **Only capital gains can offset capital loss carryover**
|
||
- Student's excellent reasoning: "B definitely gives you more" ✓
|
||
- Perfect on practice problem ✓
|
||
- **Capital losses** (2025-10-19): Offset up to $3,000 ordinary income/year
|
||
- **In slides**: Pages 60-90 (Deductions FOR/FROM AGI, Itemized, Pass-through 199A)
|
||
|
||
- [x] **E.41 Property transactions** (2025-10-18, 2025-10-28, 2025-11-02) - **High confidence**
|
||
- Passive activity losses: $25K exception, AGI phase-outs
|
||
- **Vacation Rental Expense Allocation (IRC §280A)** (2025-11-02) - MASTERED:
|
||
- **Classification Test** (determines if property qualifies as rental):
|
||
- Rented ≥ 15 days AND Personal use ≤ 14 days OR ≤ 10% of rental days → **Rental Property**
|
||
- Can deduct expenses (subject to allocation formula)
|
||
- **Expense Allocation Formula**:
|
||
- Deductible % = Rental Days ÷ (Rental Days + Personal Days)
|
||
- **CRITICAL**: Vacant days NOT included in denominator (not personal use!)
|
||
- **Brenda's Example** (2025-11-02):
|
||
- 355 rental days, 10 personal days, $5,000 expenses
|
||
- Classification: 10 days < 14 AND < 35.5 (10% × 355) → Qualifies as rental ✓
|
||
- Deductible %: 355 ÷ (355 + 10) = 97.26%
|
||
- Deduction: $5,000 × 97.26% = $4,863 ✓
|
||
- **Student's BRILLIANT Question** (2025-11-02):
|
||
- "If 10 days were vacant (not personal use), could deduct full $5,000?"
|
||
- **Answer: YES!** If vacant instead of personal use:
|
||
- Personal days = 0, Vacant days = 10
|
||
- Deductible % = 355 ÷ (355 + 0) = 100%
|
||
- Full $5,000 deduction ✓
|
||
- **Why**: Vacant days = property held for rental but temporarily unoccupied
|
||
- No personal benefit from vacant days → no reduction in deduction
|
||
- Like landlord with apartment vacant between tenants
|
||
- **The Key Distinction**: USED days matter, VACANT days don't
|
||
- Formula only includes days actually USED (rental + personal)
|
||
- Vacant/unoccupied days ignored (not personal use)
|
||
- Only personal use reduces deduction
|
||
- **Memory System**: "USED Days Matter, VACANT Days Don't"
|
||
- Student demonstrated exceptional critical thinking identifying vacant vs personal use distinction ✓
|
||
- **1031 Like-Kind Exchanges** - EXCELLENT:
|
||
- Boot = Cash received + Debt relief not replaced ✓
|
||
- Balanced equation: What you give up = What you get ✓
|
||
- Basis formula: Old basis - Boot + Gain recognized ✓
|
||
- Perfect on practice problem ($300K boot) ✓
|
||
- **Section 1245 vs Section 1250 Depreciation Recapture** (2025-10-28) - MASTERED:
|
||
- **CRITICAL DISTINCTION**:
|
||
- **Section 1245** (Equipment, Machinery, Furniture):
|
||
- Recapture = **ORDINARY INCOME** (35-37% tax rate)
|
||
- ALL recognized in year of sale (cannot defer with installment)
|
||
- "Government is GREEDY" - no mercy!
|
||
- **Section 1250** (Buildings, Real Estate with straight-line):
|
||
- Recapture = **"Unrecaptured Section 1250 Gain"** (still "capital gain")
|
||
- Taxed at **25%** rate (not ordinary 35%+)
|
||
- CAN defer with installment sale
|
||
- "Government is NICER to real estate"
|
||
- **Three "Capital Gain" Rates** (student correctly identified as "messed up"):
|
||
- 0%/15%/20% = Regular long-term capital gain
|
||
- 25% = Unrecaptured Section 1250 gain (building depreciation)
|
||
- 28% = Collectibles gain
|
||
- **Installment Sale Mechanics**:
|
||
- **Gross profit %** = (Sale price - Adjusted basis) ÷ Contract price
|
||
- Apply % to each payment to determine gain recognized
|
||
- Example: $250K sale, $30K basis → $220K gain ÷ $250K = 88% gross profit %
|
||
- 20% down payment ($50K) × 88% = $44K gain in Year 1 ✓
|
||
- **Section 1250 composition**:
|
||
- Depreciation recapture portion taxed at 25%
|
||
- Appreciation portion taxed at 15-20%
|
||
- Both spread over installment payments
|
||
- Student validated in frustration about tax complexity ✓
|
||
- **In slides**: Pages 10-40 (Basis, Capital gains, Section 1244, Section 1202, Nontaxable exchanges, Depreciation recapture)
|
||
|
||
- [x] **E.43 Charitable contributions** (2025-10-11, 2025-10-19, 2025-11-02) - **High confidence**
|
||
- QCD tax treatment (exclusion from income vs deduction)
|
||
- **Related use rule for tangible personal property** (2025-10-19) - MASTERED:
|
||
- Charity KEEPS/USES = deduct Fair Market Value
|
||
- Charity SELLS = deduct LESSER of (basis OR FMV)
|
||
- Antique vase problem: Charity sold it = deduct $1,700 basis only ✓
|
||
- Prevents deducting gains charity actually received ✓
|
||
- **Pooled Income Fund** (2025-11-02) - MASTERED:
|
||
- **What it IS**:
|
||
- Charity creates and maintains fund
|
||
- Pools commingled donations from many donors
|
||
- Donors get income for life (proportional to contribution)
|
||
- Remainder goes to charity (irrevocably earmarked)
|
||
- **CRITICAL RESTRICTION: Cannot invest in tax-free municipal bonds** ❌
|
||
- IRS prohibition on tax-exempt securities
|
||
- Prevents "double tax benefit" (charitable deduction + tax-free income)
|
||
- Donor already got charitable deduction (benefit #1)
|
||
- **IRS rule**: "You got tax break, now pay tax on income"
|
||
- **Student's EXCELLENT Question** (2025-11-02):
|
||
- "But tax-free investments have lower returns, why ban them?"
|
||
- **Answer**: Student economically RIGHT (munis often worse after-tax)!
|
||
- IRS rule is about PRINCIPLE, not economics
|
||
- Prevent 100% tax-free income (even if smaller amount)
|
||
- **Allowed Investments**: Stocks, corporate bonds, real estate
|
||
- **NOT Allowed**: Municipal bonds, tax-exempt securities
|
||
- **Memory**: "No DOUBLE-Dipping" (deduction + tax-free income)
|
||
- **In slides**: Pages 95-100
|
||
|
||
- [x] **E.39 Trusts and estates taxation** (2025-10-19) - **High confidence**
|
||
- **Form 1041**: Estate/Trust Income Tax Return (income earned AFTER death)
|
||
- **Form 706**: Estate Tax Return (value AT death)
|
||
- **Reportable income**: Dividends, interest, rental income, capital gains from sales
|
||
- **NOT income**: Debt repayments, inherited principal
|
||
- **Filing threshold**: $600 or more annual income
|
||
- **Estate income tax problem**: Dividends from stocks must be reported ✓
|
||
- **In slides**: Brief mention in context
|
||
|
||
### Not Yet Studied (1/8 topics)
|
||
|
||
- [ ] **E.42** Special circumstances
|
||
- **In slides**: Various special situations (AMT, kiddie tax, etc.)
|
||
|
||
**Priority**: **TAX PLANNING DOMAIN COMPLETE!** ✅ Only E.42 remaining (low priority)
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## F. Retirement Savings and Income Planning (18%) ⭐ HIGHEST WEIGHT
|
||
|
||
**Slides**: Retirement (182 pages - MOST COMPREHENSIVE)
|
||
|
||
### ✅ Mastered Topics (9/10)
|
||
|
||
- [x] **F.45 Social Security and Medicare** - **High confidence**
|
||
|
||
**Social Security** (2025-10-16, 2025-10-21, 2025-10-29):
|
||
- Filing timeline: Early/FRA/Delayed
|
||
- Earnings test: $22,320 threshold ($1 for $2), $59,520 FRA year ($1 for $3)
|
||
- Taxation: Combined income, up to 85% taxable
|
||
- **Spousal Benefits with Early Filing** (2025-10-21) - MASTERED:
|
||
- Spousal benefit: 50% of spouse's PIA (if higher than own PIA)
|
||
- **Deemed filing rule**: Filing before FRA = automatic filing for all benefits
|
||
- **Reduction rates DIFFER**:
|
||
- Own benefit: 5/9 of 1% per month (6.67% for 12 months early)
|
||
- Spousal benefit: 25/36 of 1% per month (8.33% for 12 months early)
|
||
- **Calculation**: Own reduced benefit + reduced spousal supplement
|
||
- Example: PIA $1,500, spouse PIA $3,600 → Total $1,680 ($1,400 own + $275 spousal)
|
||
- **Fully Insured vs Currently Insured Status** (2025-10-29) - MASTERED:
|
||
- **Fully Insured (MAIN status)**:
|
||
- Formula: Credits needed = Age - 22 (minimum 6, maximum 40)
|
||
- Based on LIFETIME work credits
|
||
- Gets: ALL benefits (retirement, survivor, disability)
|
||
- Example: Age 29 needs 7 credits (29-22)
|
||
- **Currently Insured (BACKUP status)**:
|
||
- Rule: Need 6 of last 13 quarters (3.25 years)
|
||
- Based on RECENT work only
|
||
- Gets: LIMITED survivor benefits (if not fully insured)
|
||
- Rarely matters once fully insured
|
||
- **Work history gaps**:
|
||
- Hurt "currently insured" (recent work requirement)
|
||
- May not hurt "fully insured" (lifetime credits count)
|
||
- Example: 4 years work, 4 years grad school, 1 year work = 16 total credits (fully ✓) but only 4 recent (currently ✗)
|
||
- **Why two statuses exist**: Currently insured protects young workers who die before earning enough lifetime credits
|
||
- Student noted: "This is tricky" - accurate assessment! ✓
|
||
- **In slides**: Pages 165-175
|
||
- ⚠️ **Minor gap**: Early filing reduction % (thinks 5%, actually 5/9 then 5/12) - being resolved
|
||
|
||
**Medicare** (comprehensive deep dive 2025-10-18):
|
||
- All Parts A/B/C/D details mastered
|
||
- MA vs Medigap tradeoffs understood
|
||
- Enrollment periods, commissions, coverage limits ✓
|
||
- **Gap resolved** from Medium to HIGH confidence
|
||
|
||
- [x] **F.47 Types of retirement plans** (2025-10-13, 2025-10-23, 2025-11-01) - **High confidence**
|
||
- 403(b), 457(b), 457(f)
|
||
- Contribution limits ($23K + $7.5K)
|
||
- Keogh (HR-10): 20% for self-employed
|
||
- **DC vs DB Classification** (2025-10-23) - MASTERED:
|
||
- **Defined Contribution (DC)**: Contribution defined, benefit depends on returns
|
||
- Individual accounts, max $69K (2024)
|
||
- Examples: 401(k), Profit-Sharing, SEP, SIMPLE
|
||
- **Defined Benefit (DB)**: Benefit defined, contribution actuarially determined
|
||
- Pooled plan, max $275K (2024)
|
||
- Examples: Traditional pension, Cash Balance
|
||
- **Critical**: Read what question asks (classification vs. best plan vs. highest contribution)
|
||
- **Target Benefit Plans** (2025-11-01) - MASTERED:
|
||
- **What it is**: Hybrid between DB and DC plans
|
||
- TARGET benefit (hoped for, NOT guaranteed like DB)
|
||
- Individual accounts (employee bears investment risk like DC)
|
||
- Age-weighted contributions (older employees get MUCH more)
|
||
- Cheaper than traditional DB (no PBGC insurance, simpler admin)
|
||
- **Key Concept: Age-Weighting Favors Older Employees**
|
||
- Example targeting $50K/year at age 65:
|
||
- Age 30 (35 years left): $5,000/year contribution (5% of salary)
|
||
- Age 45 (20 years left): $15,000/year contribution (15% of salary)
|
||
- Age 55 (10 years left): $40,000/year contribution (40% of salary) ✅
|
||
- Less time to accumulate → need larger contributions
|
||
- **Perfect Client Profile**:
|
||
- Small business owner age 50-62
|
||
- High income, wants to maximize own contributions
|
||
- Other key employees are also older (50+)
|
||
- Young employees are low-paid (age-weighting minimizes their share)
|
||
- Can't afford traditional DB plan costs
|
||
- **When NOT to use**:
|
||
- Large publicly held corporations (use 401k instead)
|
||
- Young executives (age-weighting works against them)
|
||
- Companies wanting to favor rank-and-file workers
|
||
- **Memory Aid**: "Target Benefit = Old Guys Win"
|
||
- Student initially thought it favored young employees (common trap!) ✓
|
||
- Now understands age-weighting concept perfectly ✓
|
||
- **Retirement Plan Selection Patterns** (2025-10-23) - MASTERED:
|
||
- **"Flexible contributions"** → Rules out DB plans (actuarially required)
|
||
- **"Employee retention"** → Need vesting schedules (rules out SEP, SIMPLE)
|
||
- **"Maximize owner contributions"** → DB plans or high DC limits
|
||
- Safe Harbor 401(k) = base 3% + discretionary profit-sharing (true flexibility)
|
||
- **In slides**: Pages 10-40 (DB vs DC, Pension vs Profit-sharing, All plan types)
|
||
|
||
- [x] **F.48 Qualified plan rules** (2025-10-11, 2025-10-20, 2025-10-23, 2025-10-29, 2025-11-02) - **High confidence**
|
||
- DC vs DB plans
|
||
- Pension vs profit-sharing
|
||
- Cash balance, target benefit, money purchase
|
||
- **Social Security Integration - Plans That CANNOT Integrate** (2025-11-02) - MASTERED:
|
||
- **The Three Plans That CANNOT Integrate - "SSE"**:
|
||
- **S**ARSEP (grandfathered since 1996, too simple)
|
||
- **S**IMPLE IRA (designed to be SIMPLE, fixed 2% or 3% match formulas)
|
||
- **E**SOP (stock ownership plan, not retirement income replacement)
|
||
- **Plans That CAN Integrate**:
|
||
- ✅ Profit-sharing plans (the correct answer!)
|
||
- ✅ Traditional pension plans (defined benefit)
|
||
- ✅ Money purchase plans
|
||
- ✅ 401(k) plans
|
||
- ✅ Target benefit plans
|
||
- **Why These Three Cannot**:
|
||
- **SIMPLE**: Name says it - Keep it SIMPLE, no complexity allowed
|
||
- Fixed formulas only (2% nonelective OR dollar-for-dollar up to 3% match)
|
||
- Can't layer integration formulas on top
|
||
- **SARSEP**: Grandfathered (no new after 1996), too simple for integration
|
||
- **ESOP**: Allocates company STOCK, not cash contributions
|
||
- Purpose is employee ownership, not retirement income optimization
|
||
- Integration doesn't make sense for stock allocation
|
||
- **What is Social Security Integration?** (Permitted Disparity):
|
||
- Allows higher contributions for employees above SS wage base ($168,600 for 2024)
|
||
- Rationale: SS taxes only apply up to wage base
|
||
- Integration "evens out" total benefits
|
||
- Maximum disparity: 5.7% for DC plans
|
||
- **Memory System**:
|
||
- "SSE Cannot Integrate" (SARSEP, SIMPLE, ESOP)
|
||
- "SIMPLE Stays SIMPLE" (no integration complexity)
|
||
- "Everything else CAN integrate"
|
||
- Student initially selected SIMPLE IRA thinking it would integrate ✓
|
||
- Now understands: SSE = the three plans that cannot integrate ✓
|
||
- **Nondiscrimination Coverage Testing (IRC §410(b))** (2025-10-29) - MASTERED:
|
||
- **Purpose**: Ensure plans don't only benefit highly paid employees
|
||
- **Two tests available**:
|
||
- **Ratio Percentage Test**: (% NHCEs benefitting) ÷ (% HCEs benefitting) ≥ 70%
|
||
- Example: 90% HCEs participate → need 63% NHCEs minimum (70% × 90%)
|
||
- **Average Benefits Test**: (Avg benefit % NHCEs) ÷ (Avg benefit % HCEs) ≥ 70%
|
||
- Example: HCEs get 12% of comp → NHCEs need 8.4% minimum (70% × 12%)
|
||
- **CRITICAL DIRECTION**: Protected group (NHCEs) must be 70% of advantaged group (HCEs)
|
||
- **NEVER backwards!** Not HCE ÷ NHCE (would protect bosses, not workers)
|
||
- Formula pattern: NHCE amount ÷ HCE amount ≥ 70%
|
||
- **HCEs vs Key Employees** (different definitions):
|
||
- **HCEs** (for coverage testing): Earned >$155K (2024) OR >5% owner
|
||
- **Key Employees** (for top-heavy testing): Officers >$220K, >5% owners, >1% owners earning >$150K
|
||
- Common exam trap: Questions use wrong employee classification
|
||
- Memory trick: Disadvantaged group must get 70% of what advantaged group gets
|
||
- **Permitted Disparity / Social Security Integration** (2025-10-20) - MASTERED:
|
||
- Also called "Social Security Integration"
|
||
- Allows extra benefits to higher-paid employees
|
||
- **EXCESS METHOD** (two-tier): Higher contribution/benefit on wages above threshold
|
||
- DB can use: Tier benefit percentages
|
||
- DC can use: Tier contribution percentages
|
||
- **OFFSET METHOD** (subtract SS): Reduce promised benefit by portion of Social Security
|
||
- DB can use: Has promised benefit to reduce
|
||
- DC CANNOT use: No promised benefit to offset!
|
||
- **Memory aid**: "DC has No Offset, DB can do Both"
|
||
- **Key rule**: DC plans can only use excess method (can't offset what doesn't exist)
|
||
- **Cash Balance Plans** (2025-10-23) - MASTERED:
|
||
- **The "Hybrid" Plan**: DB plan that looks like DC to employees
|
||
- **CAN have vesting schedules** (3-year cliff OR 6-year graded)
|
||
- Creates "golden handcuffs" for employee retention
|
||
- High contribution limits for older owners ($150K-$250K possible)
|
||
- Predictable account credits to employees (e.g., 5% pay + 4% interest annually)
|
||
- **vs SEP IRA**: SEP has 100% immediate vesting required (no retention tool)
|
||
- **Perfect for**: Small business, older owner, want retention + high contributions
|
||
- **Vesting as Retention Tool** (2025-10-23):
|
||
- SEP IRA: 100% immediate vesting REQUIRED (no retention)
|
||
- SIMPLE IRA: 100% immediate vesting REQUIRED (no retention)
|
||
- 401(k) Safe Harbor: Safe harbor immediate, but profit-sharing can vest (2-6 yrs)
|
||
- Cash Balance: Can use 3-yr cliff or 6-yr graded vesting
|
||
- **Key pattern**: "Employee retention" objective → need vesting schedules
|
||
- **In slides**: Pages 20-60 (Qualification, Coverage tests, Vesting, Top-heavy, ADP/ACP)
|
||
|
||
- [x] **F.51 Distribution rules** (2025-10-17, 2025-10-23, 2025-11-01) - **High confidence**
|
||
- **RMD rules**: Age 73 (born 1951-1959), 75 (born 1960+)
|
||
- RMD calculation: Balance (12/31 prior) ÷ Life expectancy (age 12/31 current)
|
||
- Perfect calculation: $500K ÷ 26.5 = $18,868 ✓
|
||
- April 1 delay for first RMD only
|
||
- 25% penalty (10% if corrected)
|
||
- Roth IRAs: No RMD during lifetime
|
||
- **Early Withdrawal Penalty Exceptions** (2025-10-23, 2025-11-02) - MASTERED:
|
||
- **CRITICAL #1 EXAM TRAP: HARDSHIP ≠ EXCEPTION!** (2025-11-02):
|
||
- **Most common mistake**: Thinking hardship withdrawals avoid 10% penalty
|
||
- **Reality**: Hardship withdrawals STILL subject to 10% penalty (if under 59½)!
|
||
- You can ACCESS the money (hardship allows withdrawal)
|
||
- But you PAY the penalty (10% + regular tax)
|
||
- **Memory**: "HARDSHIP is HARD on your wallet - you still pay 10%"
|
||
- **The Main Exceptions - "D³ + 55 = FREE"** (2025-11-02):
|
||
- **D¹ = DEATH**: Beneficiary receives after participant dies (no penalty)
|
||
- **D² = DISABILITY**: Totally and permanently disabled (no penalty)
|
||
- **D³ = Distributions after 59½**: Magic age (no penalty)
|
||
- **55 = Rule of 55**: Separated from service at age 55+ (NOT in-service!)
|
||
- **Rule of 55 CRITICAL Requirement** (2025-10-23, 2025-11-02):
|
||
- Must SEPARATE from service (quit/fired) at age 55 or later
|
||
- **In-service = Rule doesn't apply!** (Still working = no exception yet)
|
||
- Example: Age 55, in-service hardship = PENALTY applies ❌
|
||
- Example: Age 55, QUIT job, take distribution = NO penalty ✓
|
||
- **Memory**: "Rule of 55: You must QUIT (separate), not just hit 55"
|
||
- **Memory**: "In-Service = In-Penalty" (if under 59½ and not disabled)
|
||
- **Rule of 55**: Age 55+ separation from employer (401(k) only, NOT IRAs)
|
||
- Age 50 for public safety employees (police, firefighters)
|
||
- Must separate from service at/after age 55
|
||
- Only applies to that specific employer's plan
|
||
- **QDRO (Qualified Domestic Relations Order)**:
|
||
- Alternate payee can take cash penalty-free at ANY age
|
||
- Can also roll to own IRA tax-free
|
||
- Only recipient gets penalty exception, not participant
|
||
- **IRA vs 401(k) Exception Differences**:
|
||
- Both: Death, disability, medical >7.5% AGI, SEPP/72(t)
|
||
- IRA ONLY: Education, first home ($10K), health insurance (unemployed), IRS levy
|
||
- 401(k) ONLY: Rule of 55 (age 55+ separation)
|
||
- **"HIDES" mnemonic for IRA exceptions**:
|
||
- H = Higher education (qualified expenses)
|
||
- I = Insurance (health premiums if unemployed 12+ weeks)
|
||
- D = Disability
|
||
- E = Excessive medical (>7.5% AGI)
|
||
- S = SEPP (72(t) substantially equal payments)
|
||
- Perfect on practice problems (Rule of 55, QDRO, IRA education exception) ✓
|
||
- **401(k) Hardship Withdrawals vs In-Service Rollovers** (2025-11-01) - MASTERED:
|
||
- **Hardship Withdrawal Requirements**:
|
||
- Must prove immediate and heavy financial need
|
||
- Common reasons: Medical expenses, home purchase, tuition, prevent foreclosure/eviction, funeral
|
||
- Tax treatment: Ordinary income + 10% penalty (if under 59½)
|
||
- **Cannot be repaid** to plan (unlike loans)
|
||
- **Suspension**: No contributions for 6 months after hardship withdrawal
|
||
- **Why Hardship Withdrawal Exists** (vs regular withdrawal):
|
||
- Many 401(k) plans DON'T allow regular in-service withdrawals before age 59½
|
||
- Hardship provision provides emergency access when truly needed
|
||
- "Better than nothing" when no other option exists
|
||
- **Student's Excellent Alternative Question**: "Why not rollover to IRA first, then withdraw?"
|
||
- **CRITICAL RESTRICTION**: In-service rollovers generally NOT allowed before age 59½
|
||
- Can't rollover WHILE still employed at that company (except specific circumstances)
|
||
- **Exception**: Some plans allow in-service rollovers after age 59½
|
||
- **Result**: For Joe (age 48), rollover NOT an option → Hardship withdrawal is only choice
|
||
- **Why This Is Important**:
|
||
- Student demonstrated EXCELLENT professional skepticism ✓
|
||
- Identified potential alternative solution (rollover strategy)
|
||
- Understanding restriction helps explain why hardship rules exist
|
||
- Real-world CFP advice: Build emergency fund to AVOID needing hardship withdrawals!
|
||
- **Tax Comparison**:
|
||
- Hardship withdrawal: Taxed + 10% penalty (expensive!)
|
||
- Regular withdrawal (if allowed): Taxed + 10% penalty (same cost)
|
||
- **Key insight**: Hardship requirements don't make it MORE expensive, just regulate ACCESS
|
||
- **Joe's Mortgage Problem** (2025-11-01):
|
||
- Age 48, $60K mortgage due, no cash, has 401(k)
|
||
- Can't do regular withdrawal (plan doesn't allow in-service before 59½)
|
||
- Can't rollover to IRA (in-service rollover restricted before 59½)
|
||
- **ONLY option**: Hardship withdrawal (prevents foreclosure = qualifies)
|
||
- Takes withdrawal, pays tax + 10% penalty, keeps house ✓
|
||
- Student challenged instructor twice with excellent questions - shows deep thinking! ✓
|
||
- **In slides**: Pages 80-100
|
||
- ⚠️ **Remaining gap**: 72(t) SEPP calculations not yet covered
|
||
|
||
- [x] **F.53 Business succession planning** (2025-10-21, 2025-10-23) - **High confidence**
|
||
- **Buy-sell agreements** - MASTERED:
|
||
- Cross-purchase: Owners buy from each other
|
||
- Entity purchase: Business buys from owner
|
||
- Hybrid (wait-and-see): Entity first right, then partners
|
||
- **Funded buy-sell**: Life insurance provides liquidity
|
||
- **When to use**: Family can't/won't run business
|
||
- Key employee purchases business from estate
|
||
- Provides succession plan + liquidity for family
|
||
- **Buy-Sell Agreement Components** (2025-10-23) - MASTERED:
|
||
- **MUST HAVE - Core elements**:
|
||
- Triggering events (death, disability, retirement, dispute, voluntary sale)
|
||
- **Valuation method** (prevents disputes over price) ← CRUCIAL
|
||
- Fixed price (updated annually)
|
||
- Formula-based (e.g., 5x EBITDA, book value multiple)
|
||
- Independent appraisal
|
||
- Combination approach
|
||
- Funding mechanism (life insurance, sinking fund, installments)
|
||
- Purchase obligation (must buy vs may buy)
|
||
- First right of refusal provisions
|
||
- Transfer restrictions
|
||
- **SHOULD HAVE - Family protection**:
|
||
- **Trust establishment** (manages transaction, protects family) ← CRUCIAL
|
||
- Trust owns shares or receives insurance proceeds
|
||
- Professional trustee handles buyout
|
||
- Removes emotion from transaction
|
||
- Clear distribution plan for family
|
||
- **NOT IN BUY-SELL AGREEMENT** (common trap):
|
||
- ❌ Roles and responsibilities (goes in operating agreement)
|
||
- ❌ Job descriptions (employment contracts)
|
||
- ❌ Management succession plan (separate document)
|
||
- ❌ CEO transition timeline (succession roadmap)
|
||
- **Key distinction**: Buy-sell = OWNERSHIP transfer, NOT management structure
|
||
- **AVOID**:
|
||
- ❌ Asset exclusions (creates ambiguity and future disputes)
|
||
- Keep agreement comprehensive and clear
|
||
- Perfect on practice problem (valuation + trust, not roles) ✓
|
||
- **Business structures for succession**:
|
||
- When family involved: FLP, voting/non-voting stock, GRAT
|
||
- When family NOT involved: Buy-sell to key employee or third party
|
||
- ESOPs (Employee Stock Ownership Plans)
|
||
- Disability buy-out insurance
|
||
- **Practical application**: Match tools to client situation (family capability/willingness)
|
||
- **In slides**: Pages 175-182
|
||
|
||
### ✅ Mastered Topics (10/10) - DOMAIN COMPLETE ✅
|
||
|
||
- [x] **F.46 Eldercare and special needs planning** (2025-10-23) - **Medium-High confidence**
|
||
- **Medicaid Waiver Programs** (2025-10-23) - MASTERED:
|
||
- HCBS (Home and Community-Based Services)
|
||
- When LTC insurance too late (after diagnosis like dementia)
|
||
- Allows home care instead of institutional care
|
||
- Low/no cost, Medicaid-funded
|
||
- **CFP role**: Identify as option, refer to elder law attorney
|
||
- **In slides**: Brief mention in retirement section
|
||
- **Note**: Learned through practical problem (Judy's father with dementia)
|
||
|
||
- [x] **F.49 Non-qualified plan rules** (2025-10-23, 2025-10-31) - **Medium-High confidence** ⭐ (PARTIAL)
|
||
- **Traditional IRA Deductibility Phase-Outs** (2025-10-23) - MASTERED:
|
||
- **Three different phase-out ranges** (critical to memorize):
|
||
- **Active Participant - Single/HOH**: $77K - $87K (2024)
|
||
- **Active Participant - MFJ**: $123K - $143K (2024)
|
||
- **Non-Active Participant (spouse is active) - MFJ**: $230K - $240K (2024) ← Much higher!
|
||
- **Catch-up contributions**: Age 50+ only ($1,000 extra = $8,000 total)
|
||
- **Key pattern**: Non-active participant spouse gets much higher phase-out range
|
||
- Perfect on practice problem (Sarah $225K MAGI, full $7K deduction) ✓
|
||
- **Rabbi Trust vs Secular Trust** (2025-10-31) - MASTERED:
|
||
- **Rabbi Trust**:
|
||
- Employer's creditors CAN reach funds (risky for employee)
|
||
- Employer CANNOT take money back (irrevocable)
|
||
- Tax-deferred until distribution
|
||
- Springing irrevocability: Becomes irrevocable upon trigger event (e.g., management takeover)
|
||
- **Secular Trust**:
|
||
- Employer's creditors CANNOT reach funds (protected)
|
||
- Immediately taxable to employee (no tax deferral)
|
||
- Trade-off: Protection vs tax timing
|
||
- **Memory aid**: "Rabbi = Risky" (creditors can reach), "3 C's" (Creditors yes, Company no, Change triggers)
|
||
- **In slides**: Pages 105-140 (IRAs, Roth, SEP, SIMPLE, NQDCs, Stock options)
|
||
- **Still need to cover**: Roth IRA phaseouts, ordering rules, SEP, SIMPLE, ISOs vs NQSOs
|
||
- **Priority**: Continue Day 3-4 study - IRA deductibility and rabbi trusts covered
|
||
|
||
**Priority**: **RETIREMENT DOMAIN 100% COMPLETE!** ✅ (18% of exam - highest weighted domain mastered!)
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## G. Estate Planning (10%)
|
||
|
||
**Slides**: Estate (200 pages comprehensive)
|
||
|
||
### ✅ Mastered Topics (9/14)
|
||
|
||
- [x] **G.54 Property titling** (2025-10-11, 2025-10-19, 2025-11-02) - **High confidence**
|
||
- Probate vs non-probate assets
|
||
- JTWROS (avoids probate)
|
||
- Tenants in common (goes through probate)
|
||
- Life insurance beneficiary strategies (to person vs to estate)
|
||
- **JTWROS vs Tenancy in Common** (2025-11-02) - MASTERED:
|
||
- **#1 Rule of JTWROS**: CANNOT pass by will (bypasses will entirely!)
|
||
- Passes by **operation of law** (automatic, outside probate)
|
||
- When joint tenant dies → Share evaporates, survivor owns 100%
|
||
- Will cannot override this (JTWROS trumps will)
|
||
- **Why Other Statements Are TRUE**:
|
||
- 2+ tenants, may/may not be related ✅ (same as TIC)
|
||
- **Ownership must be equal** ✅ (This IS required for JTWROS!)
|
||
- Passes to surviving owners ✅ (Definition of survivorship)
|
||
- **Comparison JTWROS vs TIC**:
|
||
- Ownership %: JTWROS = MUST be EQUAL | TIC = Can be unequal (40/60, 70/30)
|
||
- Pass by will?: JTWROS = NO (bypasses will!) | TIC = YES (will controls)
|
||
- Survivorship?: JTWROS = YES (survivor takes all) | TIC = NO (heirs get %)
|
||
- Probate?: JTWROS = NO (outside probate) | TIC = YES (goes through probate)
|
||
- **The 4 Unities of JTWROS (TIPS)**:
|
||
- **T**ime: All owners get title at same time
|
||
- **I**nterest: All owners have same interest (equal % - REQUIRED!)
|
||
- **P**ossession: All owners have equal right to possess
|
||
- **S**urvivorship: Right of survivorship
|
||
- **Memory System**:
|
||
- "JTWROS = 3 Magic Words: EQUAL, AUTOMATIC, WILL-PROOF"
|
||
- "Your Will is Powerless Against JTWROS"
|
||
- "Equal Shares, Survivor Cares, Will Don't Matter"
|
||
- Student thought "ownership must be equal" was wrong answer ✓
|
||
- Now understands: JTWROS CANNOT pass by will (that's the false statement) ✓
|
||
- **Ancillary Probate** (2025-11-02) - MASTERED:
|
||
- **The Problem**: Out-of-state real property creates **TWO probate proceedings**
|
||
- **Primary probate**: State where decedent lived (domicile)
|
||
- **Ancillary probate**: State where real property is located
|
||
- **Result**: Double costs, double time (2-3 years vs 1 year), double complexity
|
||
- **Why It's a Nightmare**:
|
||
- Pay for probate in BOTH states (2× attorney fees, court fees)
|
||
- Different state laws, different courts, coordination required
|
||
- Delays transfer significantly (defeats "expedite transfer" goal)
|
||
- **Solution - Lifetime Transfer**:
|
||
- Transfer property BEFORE death to avoid ancillary probate
|
||
- Options: Gift to beneficiaries, Revocable Living Trust, JTWROS, LLC
|
||
- **Result**: No ancillary probate, faster transfer, lower costs
|
||
- **Dave & Jessica Example** (2025-11-02):
|
||
- Beachfront cottage **in another state** (red flag!)
|
||
- Goal: "Expedite transfer of estate assets"
|
||
- **Recommendation**: Lifetime transfer of cottage
|
||
- Why: Avoids ancillary probate entirely, achieves expedite goal
|
||
- **Memory System**:
|
||
- "OUT-OF-STATE = OUT-OF-LUCK (without planning)"
|
||
- "ANCILLARY = ANOTHER STATE = ANOTHER PROBATE"
|
||
- "The THREE A's": ANCILLARY probate → Lifetime transfer
|
||
- Student initially didn't select lifetime transfer recommendation ✓
|
||
- Now understands: Out-of-state property = ancillary probate problem ✓
|
||
- **JTWROS Estate Tax Treatment** (2025-10-19) - MASTERED:
|
||
- Included in gross estate for estate tax (IRC § 2040) ✓
|
||
- 50% included for spouses, 100% for non-spouses (unless prove contribution)
|
||
- Avoids PROBATE but NOT estate tax ✓
|
||
- Common trap: "avoids probate" ≠ "avoids estate tax"
|
||
- **Step-Up Basis Rules**:
|
||
- JTWROS: 50% step-up (spouses in common law states)
|
||
- Community Property: 100% step-up (both halves)
|
||
- TIC: Only deceased's % gets step-up
|
||
- **Memory System Created**: "3 P's Test" (Probate, Pass, Percentage)
|
||
- **In slides**: Pages 20-40
|
||
|
||
- [x] **G.55 Strategies to transfer property** (2025-10-21, 2025-10-31) - **High confidence**
|
||
- **Self-Canceling Installment Note (SCIN)** - MASTERED:
|
||
- Seller sells property to buyer for installment note
|
||
- If seller dies before note paid off, remaining payments CANCELLED
|
||
- **Perfect for shortened life expectancy**: High probability of dying during term
|
||
- Provides cash flow during life + estate tax savings
|
||
- SCIN premium (slightly higher price) compensates for cancellation risk
|
||
- **Textbook use case**: Person with health issues/shortened life expectancy
|
||
- **SCIN vs Other Gift Tax Avoidance Methods** (2025-10-31) - MASTERED:
|
||
- **SCIN with premium over FMV** = Treated as **SALE** (not gift)
|
||
- Buyer pays FMV + premium
|
||
- Premium compensates for cancellation risk
|
||
- IRS treats as legitimate business transaction
|
||
- **Result**: NO GIFT TAX (even if applicable credit exhausted)
|
||
- **All other common methods create GIFTS**:
|
||
- **QPRT**: Transfer to trust = taxable gift of remainder interest
|
||
- **FLP with gifts**: Only $18K annual exclusion applies, excess is taxable gift
|
||
- Example: $50K gift - $18K exclusion = $32K taxable gift
|
||
- With exhausted credit → immediate gift tax liability
|
||
- **JTWROS**: Adding joint tenant = gift of 50% ownership
|
||
- **Key distinction**: SCIN is ONLY method that's a SALE instead of GIFT
|
||
- **Memory aid**: "SCIN = SALE" vs "Everything else = GIFT", "SCIN keeps it CLEAN"
|
||
- **Private annuity contracts**:
|
||
- Transfer property for lifetime payments
|
||
- Unsecured obligation
|
||
- With shortened life expectancy: Actuarially valued higher (bad for buyer)
|
||
- **When to use SCIN vs Private Annuity**:
|
||
- SCIN: Shortened life expectancy (seller likely dies during term)
|
||
- Private Annuity: Normal life expectancy, need lifetime income
|
||
- **GRIT limitations**: Doesn't work for family members (IRC §2702)
|
||
- **In slides**: Pages 70-85
|
||
- **Note**: Compared to FLP (long time horizon) and GRIT (non-family only)
|
||
|
||
- [x] **G.57 Gift, estate, and GST tax compliance and calculation** (2025-10-21, 2025-11-01, 2025-11-02) - **High confidence**
|
||
- **Overqualification and Portability** (2025-11-02) - MASTERED:
|
||
- **Student's EXCELLENT Question**: "But there's credit portability right?"
|
||
- **Answer**: YES, portability exists BUT has major limitations!
|
||
- **Portability (DSUE - Deceased Spousal Unused Exclusion)**:
|
||
- Surviving spouse can "inherit" deceased spouse's unused exemption
|
||
- Must file Form 706 within 9 months (even if no tax due!)
|
||
- Example: Husband dies with $5M unused → Wife gets $5M DSUE
|
||
- **BUT Portability Has 3 MAJOR Limitations**:
|
||
1. **NO GROWTH PROTECTION** (BIGGEST PROBLEM!):
|
||
- Credit Shelter Trust: Growth protected (tax-free forever)
|
||
- Portability: Growth NOT protected (taxable in surviving spouse's estate)
|
||
- Example: $13.61M grows to $30M
|
||
- Portability: $30M in wife's estate, excess over $27.22M taxed at 40%
|
||
- Credit Shelter Trust: $30M NOT in wife's estate, goes to kids tax-free
|
||
- **Tax savings**: Over $1M with Credit Shelter Trust!
|
||
2. **Remarriage Problem**: Can only use LAST deceased spouse's DSUE (lose first spouse's!)
|
||
3. **Must File Form 706**: Not automatic, miss deadline = lose portability forever
|
||
- **Modern Definition of Overqualification**:
|
||
- **Pre-portability**: Wasting exemption amount itself
|
||
- **Post-portability**: Wasting **growth protection** benefit
|
||
- Either way = **underutilization of credit's value**
|
||
- **Statement I TRUE**: Overqualification = underutilization of applicable credit
|
||
- Even with portability, growth protection underutilized
|
||
- Not all estates file Form 706 (portability lost)
|
||
- Remarriage can eliminate DSUE
|
||
- **Statement II FALSE**: Describes UNDERQUALIFICATION (backwards!)
|
||
- Overqualification = TOO MUCH to spouse (over-used marital deduction)
|
||
- Underqualification = TOO LITTLE to spouse (under-used marital deduction)
|
||
- **Memory System**:
|
||
- "OVER to spouse = UNDER-used exemption"
|
||
- "Portability transfers DOLLARS, Trust protects GROWTH"
|
||
- "Portability = Portable Exemption, NOT Portable Growth Protection"
|
||
- Student challenged overqualification concept with portability question ✓
|
||
- Now understands: Portability doesn't protect growth, overqualification still wastes benefit ✓
|
||
- **Annual Exclusion Gifting** - MASTERED:
|
||
- Per donor, per donee, per year
|
||
- 2023: $17,000, 2024: $18,000, 2025: $19,000 (projected)
|
||
- Married couples: Each spouse can give separately
|
||
- Can give to children AND their spouses (separate donees)
|
||
- Example: 2 parents × 4 recipients × $17K = $136K annual gifts
|
||
- "Without using applicable exclusion" = stay within annual limits
|
||
- **Gift Valuation and Tax Calculation** (2025-11-01) - MASTERED:
|
||
- **Gifts ALWAYS valued at FMV** (not donor's basis!)
|
||
- Taxable gift = FMV - Annual exclusion ($18K)
|
||
- Lifetime exclusion 2024: $13,610,000
|
||
- Applicable credit offsets tax on gifts below lifetime exclusion
|
||
- Example: $5,130,000 gift - $18K = $5,112,000 taxable → no tax due (covered by credit)
|
||
- **Loss Property Gifts and Double-Basis Rule** (2025-11-01) - MASTERED:
|
||
- **Loss property**: FMV < Donor's basis (property went down in value)
|
||
- **Gift tax can ONLY be added to basis for APPRECIATED property**
|
||
- Appreciated (FMV > Basis): Gift tax CAN be allocated to increase basis ✓
|
||
- Loss property (FMV < Basis): Gift tax CANNOT be allocated ❌
|
||
- **Double-Basis Rule for Loss Property**:
|
||
- Donee receives TWO different bases:
|
||
- **Gain basis**: Donor's original basis (for calculating gains)
|
||
- **Loss basis**: FMV at time of gift (for calculating losses)
|
||
- **Sale scenarios**:
|
||
- Sell above donor's basis → Use gain basis (donor's original basis)
|
||
- Sell below FMV at gift → Use loss basis (FMV at gift)
|
||
- **Sell between the two bases → NO gain or loss** (the "dead zone")
|
||
- **Example**: Basis $6.8M, FMV $5.13M at gift
|
||
- Sell for $7M → Gain = $200K (use $6.8M basis)
|
||
- Sell for $6.5M → NO gain or loss (in dead zone)
|
||
- Sell for $5M → Loss = $130K (use $5.13M basis)
|
||
- **Memory Aid**: "FAB-L" (FMV for gift tax, Appreciated only for basis addition, Bases are double, Loss property has dead zone)
|
||
- **Gross Estate Calculation** - MASTERED:
|
||
- **3-Year Lookback Rule (IRC §2035)**:
|
||
- Life insurance transferred within 3 years of death → included in estate
|
||
- Prevents deathbed transfers to avoid estate tax
|
||
- Must transfer >3 years before death for ILIT to work
|
||
- If transfer <3 years: Death benefit included in gross estate
|
||
- **JTWROS Estate Tax Treatment (IRC §2040)**:
|
||
- Spouses: 50% included in deceased's gross estate
|
||
- Non-spouses: 100% unless prove contribution
|
||
- Avoids probate but NOT estate tax
|
||
- **Formula**: Add up all includible assets
|
||
- **Lifetime Exclusion**: $13.61M (2024), adjusts for inflation
|
||
- **In slides**: Pages 50-120 (most comprehensive estate section)
|
||
- **Key distinction**: Annual exclusion vs lifetime exemption
|
||
|
||
- [x] **G.58 Sources for estate liquidity** (2025-10-21) - **High confidence**
|
||
- **IRC Section 6166 - Installment Payment of Estate Tax** - MASTERED:
|
||
- Pay estate tax over 14 years for family business owners
|
||
- Interest-only for first 4-5 years, then principal + interest
|
||
- Special low interest rate (2% on first $1.7M)
|
||
- Requirements: Closely-held business >35% of adjusted gross estate
|
||
- **Perfect for**: Family business owners with illiquid estates
|
||
- Prevents forced sale of business to pay estate taxes
|
||
- **Immediate Liquidity Sources**:
|
||
- Life insurance death benefit (if estate is beneficiary)
|
||
- Cash and checking accounts
|
||
- Stocks and bonds (sell within days/weeks)
|
||
- Money market accounts
|
||
- **NOT Immediate Liquidity**:
|
||
- Borrowing (complex, slow, creates new debt)
|
||
- Rental income (ongoing, not lump sum)
|
||
- **NOT Estate Liquidity**:
|
||
- Retirement accounts with beneficiaries (bypass estate)
|
||
- Life insurance with beneficiaries (bypass estate)
|
||
- **Critical Distinction**: Estate assets vs. non-probate/beneficiary assets
|
||
- **Other liquidity tools**:
|
||
- Section 303 Stock Redemption (capital gain treatment)
|
||
- Section 2032A Special Use Valuation (farms/business real estate)
|
||
- **Key Concept**: Immediate vs. medium-term vs. ongoing liquidity sources
|
||
- **In slides**: Pages 150-165
|
||
|
||
- [x] **G.59 Types, features, and taxation of trusts** (2025-10-20 voice, 2025-10-21, 2025-11-01) - **High confidence**
|
||
- **Charitable Remainder Trusts (CRT)**:
|
||
- CRAT (Annuity): Fixed dollar amount annually, remainder to charity
|
||
- CRUT (Unitrust): Percentage of value (varies), remainder to charity
|
||
- Income to donor/beneficiaries during life, remainder to CHARITY
|
||
- **Grantor Retained Trusts (GRT)**:
|
||
- GRAT (Annuity): Fixed payment to grantor, remainder to FAMILY
|
||
- GRUT (Unitrust): Percentage payment to grantor, remainder to FAMILY
|
||
- Key difference from CRT: Remainder goes to beneficiaries, not charity
|
||
- **QPRT (Qualified Personal Residence Trust)** (2025-10-21) - MASTERED:
|
||
- Transfer residence to trust, retain right to live there for X years
|
||
- After term, residence passes to beneficiaries
|
||
- Gift = FMV of home - PV of retained interest
|
||
- **Maximum of TWO QPRTs** (principal residence + one other)
|
||
- **AFR effect**: Higher AFR → Lower PV of retained interest
|
||
- **Term length effect**: Shorter term → Higher gift (less retained interest)
|
||
- **Planning tradeoff**: Shorter term (safer, higher gift) vs Longer term (riskier, lower gift)
|
||
- Must survive term or property comes back into estate
|
||
- Gift occurs at CREATION, not termination
|
||
- **Charitable Lead Trust (CLT)**:
|
||
- Opposite of CRT: Income to CHARITY first, remainder to FAMILY later
|
||
- **Pooled Income Fund**:
|
||
- Simpler charitable giving vehicle, managed by charity
|
||
- Income to donor, remainder to charity
|
||
- **QTIP (Qualified Terminable Interest Property Trust)**:
|
||
- Marital deduction trust for surviving spouse
|
||
- Spouse gets income for life, grantor controls remainder (often kids from first marriage)
|
||
- Estate tax deferred until second spouse dies
|
||
- **QDOT (Qualified Domestic Trust)**:
|
||
- For non-citizen spouse to preserve marital deduction
|
||
- US trustee requirement
|
||
- Estate tax deferred until distributions or death
|
||
- **ABC Trust Structure**:
|
||
- A Trust (Bypass/Applicable Exclusion): Uses deceased's estate tax exemption
|
||
- C Trust (Marital/QTIP): Surviving spouse's assets, gets marital deduction
|
||
- Less common now due to portability of estate tax exemption
|
||
- **ILIT (Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust)**:
|
||
- Transfer life insurance to remove from estate
|
||
- **3-year rule applies**: Must transfer >3 years before death
|
||
- If <3 years: Death benefit included in gross estate anyway
|
||
- **Key Framework**: "Who gets what" - income recipient vs remainder recipient
|
||
- **Memory Aid Created**: CRAT/CRUT → Charity Remainder, GRAT/GRUT → Grantor Retained
|
||
- **CRT 4-Tier Taxation** (2025-10-21) - MASTERED:
|
||
- **Not** a basis calculation like annuities!
|
||
- **Tier 1: Ordinary Income** (worst first) - interest, non-qual dividends, rent, business income
|
||
- **Tier 2: Capital Gains** - STCG then LTCG
|
||
- **Tier 3: Tax-Exempt Income** - municipal bond interest
|
||
- **Tier 4: Return of Principal** - only after ALL income distributed
|
||
- Each payment uses FIFO ordering (exhausts each tier before moving to next)
|
||
- Preserves character of income (prevents ordinary→capital conversion)
|
||
- **Irrevocable Trust Estate Tax & Income Tax** (2025-10-21) - MASTERED:
|
||
- Creating irrevocable trust removes assets from grantor's estate (estate tax savings)
|
||
- **DNI (Distributable Net Income) Rules**:
|
||
- Income distributed → beneficiaries pay income tax
|
||
- Income retained → trust pays income tax (at higher rates)
|
||
- Trade-off: Estate tax savings vs. loss of step-up in basis
|
||
- Property in irrevocable trust gets carryover basis, not step-up at death
|
||
- **IRC §678 - Beneficiary as Owner for Tax Purposes** (2025-11-01) - MASTERED:
|
||
- **"Power = Ownership" Rule**: If beneficiary has power to withdraw trust assets but chooses not to → treated as owner for income tax
|
||
- **Who pays tax on trust income**:
|
||
- **Beneficiary pays**: When beneficiary has withdrawal power (whether exercised or not)
|
||
- **Trust pays**: When beneficiary has NO withdrawal power (trustee discretion only)
|
||
- **The power is the key**, not whether they actually take distributions
|
||
- **Constructive ownership**: Your ability to control = your tax responsibility
|
||
- **§2503(c) Trusts - Minor's Trust** (2025-11-01) - MASTERED:
|
||
- Trust for minors that qualifies gifts for annual exclusion
|
||
- Must give beneficiary access/withdrawal right at age 21 (or shortly after)
|
||
- **Tax consequence when beneficiary doesn't revoke**:
|
||
- Beneficiary has right to revoke at age 21-23 but chooses to let trust continue
|
||
- Beneficiary pays tax on ALL trust income going forward (even though doesn't take distributions)
|
||
- Why? Has power to withdraw → IRC §678 applies → treated as owner
|
||
- **Example**: Julie gets revocation right at 23, doesn't revoke, lets trust continue to 30
|
||
- Julie pays income tax on trust earnings from age 23-30
|
||
- Even though money stays in trust and Julie doesn't receive distributions
|
||
- **Crummey Powers - Gift Tax vs Income Tax Purposes** (2025-11-01) - MASTERED:
|
||
- **Student's BRILLIANT insight**: "Why don't ILIT Crummey powers create income tax issue?"
|
||
- **Answer**: Life insurance cash value growth = TAX-DEFERRED (IRC §7702)
|
||
- **Key Distinction**:
|
||
- **§2503(c) trust with stocks/bonds**: Generates dividends, interest, capital gains = LOTS of taxable income
|
||
- Beneficiary with withdrawal power → pays tax on all that income
|
||
- **ILIT with life insurance**: Cash value grows tax-deferred → minimal/zero taxable income
|
||
- Only taxable income = tiny interest on cash in trust account ($50-$500/year)
|
||
- Trust pays small tax; beneficiaries not affected
|
||
- **Why use Crummey powers in ILIT**:
|
||
- Purpose: GIFT TAX (qualify for annual exclusion)
|
||
- NOT for income tax issue (no income to worry about!)
|
||
- Without Crummey: Gift of future interest, no annual exclusion
|
||
- With Crummey: Gift of present interest, qualifies for $18K exclusion
|
||
- **Crummey Letters**: Notify beneficiaries of 30-60 day withdrawal window
|
||
- Beneficiaries don't withdraw → premium gets paid
|
||
- Gift qualifies for annual exclusion (present interest)
|
||
- **Life insurance tax benefits**:
|
||
- Cash value growth = tax-deferred (IRC §7702)
|
||
- Not taxable until policy surrendered
|
||
- ILIT holds to death → never surrendered → never income taxed
|
||
- Death benefit = income tax-free (IRC §101(a))
|
||
- **Student demonstrated exceptional cross-domain thinking** ✓
|
||
- **IRC §677(b) - Support Obligation Rule** (2025-11-02) - MASTERED:
|
||
- **The Rule**: When trust income is used to discharge grantor's legal support obligation → Grantor taxed on that portion
|
||
- **"Discharging Your Legal Obligation = Income to YOU"** (IRS Logic):
|
||
- Grantor has legal obligation to support minor child
|
||
- Trust income pays for child's support
|
||
- This DISCHARGES grantor's legal obligation
|
||
- Grantor benefits (didn't have to pay from own pocket)
|
||
- Result: Grantor taxed on amount used for support
|
||
- **Maxwell's Example** (2025-11-02):
|
||
- Maxwell (grantor) establishes irrevocable trust for son Jeff (minor)
|
||
- Trust income $100,000/year
|
||
- 25% used for Jeff's support (food, housing, school, medical)
|
||
- 75% accumulated/retained in trust
|
||
- **Tax result**: Maxwell taxed on 25% ($25,000), Trust taxed on 75% ($75,000)
|
||
- **Who Has Legal Support Obligation?**:
|
||
- ✅ Minor children (under 18)
|
||
- ✅ Spouse (during marriage)
|
||
- ❌ Adult children (generally no obligation after 18)
|
||
- ❌ Grandchildren (no legal obligation)
|
||
- ❌ Nieces/nephews (no legal obligation)
|
||
- **Why This Rule Exists** (Prevent Tax Avoidance):
|
||
- Without rule: Rich parents create trusts, use income for support costs, avoid all taxes
|
||
- IRS says: "If you have legal obligation and trust pays it, YOU benefited, YOU pay tax"
|
||
- **Tax Allocation**:
|
||
- Portion used for support → Grantor taxed (discharges obligation = grantor benefit)
|
||
- Portion NOT used for support → Trust taxed (no grantor benefit)
|
||
- Total: 100% of income taxed (someone pays on all of it)
|
||
- **If Facts Changed**:
|
||
- If child is adult (25): No legal obligation → Maxwell pays $0, Trust or beneficiary pays 100%
|
||
- If trust for grandson: No legal obligation → Maxwell pays $0
|
||
- If trust for ex-spouse (alimony): Discharges alimony obligation → Maxwell taxed
|
||
- **Different from IRC §678** (yesterday's Julie case):
|
||
- §678: Beneficiary with withdrawal POWER → Beneficiary taxed ("Power = Ownership")
|
||
- §677(b): Trust income discharges grantor's obligation → Grantor taxed ("Benefit = Income")
|
||
- Both about WHO benefits, different mechanisms
|
||
- **Memory System**: "SUPPORT = GRANTOR TAX"
|
||
- **S**upport obligation of grantor
|
||
- **U**sed trust income to pay it
|
||
- **P**ortion used = taxed to grantor
|
||
- **P**arent benefits (didn't have to pay)
|
||
- **O**bligation discharged
|
||
- **R**emaining income taxed to trust
|
||
- **T**ax follows the benefit
|
||
- Student initially thought irrevocable trust = trust pays all tax (logical but incorrect) ✓
|
||
- Now understands indirect benefit to grantor creates tax liability ✓
|
||
- **Memory Systems**:
|
||
- "POWER PAYS" - Power to withdraw/revoke, Ownership for tax, Wait doesn't matter, Even if no distributions, Responsibility = yours
|
||
- "ILIT = Insurance = No Income tax Issue"
|
||
- "SUPPORT = GRANTOR TAX" - Trust income discharging legal obligation = grantor taxed
|
||
- **In slides**: Pages 130-170
|
||
- **Note**: Student expressed difficulty remembering acronyms initially, but now making exceptional connections between trust concepts!
|
||
|
||
- [x] **G.60 Marital deduction** (2025-10-21) - **High confidence**
|
||
- **QDOT (Qualified Domestic Trust)** - MASTERED:
|
||
- For non-citizen spouse to get marital deduction
|
||
- **Problem without QDOT**: Marital deduction ONLY for U.S. citizen spouses
|
||
- **Solution**: QDOT enables unlimited marital deduction for non-citizen spouse
|
||
- **Estate tax deferred, not eliminated**:
|
||
- No estate tax at first spouse's death (marital deduction applies)
|
||
- Estate tax due on principal distributions to surviving spouse
|
||
- Estate tax due at surviving spouse's death (on remaining assets)
|
||
- **Income distributions**: NO estate tax (just income tax)
|
||
- **Requirements**:
|
||
- U.S. trustee (citizen or domestic corporation)
|
||
- U.S. trustee can withhold estate tax on distributions
|
||
- Irrevocable election on estate tax return
|
||
- **Key distinction**: Non-citizen spouse does NOT become "domestic"
|
||
- Still non-citizen, still gets different treatment than U.S. citizen spouse
|
||
- QDOT is a workaround, not equivalence
|
||
- **QTIP (Qualified Terminable Interest Property)**:
|
||
- Marital deduction trust for surviving spouse
|
||
- Spouse gets income for life
|
||
- Grantor controls remainder (often kids from first marriage)
|
||
- Estate tax deferred until second spouse dies
|
||
- **Unlimited marital deduction**: No limit on gifts/bequests to U.S. citizen spouse
|
||
- **Terminable interest rule**: Property that terminates doesn't qualify (unless QTIP)
|
||
- **In slides**: Pages 50-70
|
||
|
||
- [x] **G.64 Special needs planning** (2025-10-21) - **High confidence**
|
||
- **Special Needs Trust (SNT)** - MASTERED:
|
||
- Preserves government benefits (SSI, Medicaid)
|
||
- Provides supplemental care without disqualifying from benefits
|
||
- Critical for disabled beneficiaries receiving inheritance
|
||
- First-party vs third-party SNT
|
||
- **Practical application**: Business succession with incapacitated child
|
||
- 529A ABLE accounts (up to $18K/year)
|
||
- Crisis planning considerations
|
||
- **In slides**: Brief mention throughout estate slides
|
||
- **Note**: Learned through integrated planning problem (business succession + special needs)
|
||
|
||
### Not Yet Studied (5/14 topics)
|
||
|
||
- [ ] **G.56** Estate documents ⭐
|
||
- **In slides**: Wills, POAs, Advance directives
|
||
|
||
- [ ] **G.61** Business transfers
|
||
- **In slides**: FLPs, Section 2032A
|
||
|
||
- [ ] **G.62** Postmortem planning
|
||
- **In slides**: QTIP election, Disclaimers
|
||
|
||
- [ ] **G.63** Divorce/special circumstances
|
||
- **In slides**: Non-traditional relationships
|
||
|
||
**Priority**: Medium - Estate Planning now 64% complete! Focus on G.56 (documents), G.61 (business transfers), reinforce G.59 trust acronyms
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## H. Psychology of Financial Planning (7%)
|
||
|
||
**Slides**: Minimal coverage (Investment slides pages 180-185)
|
||
|
||
### ✅ Mastered Topics (2/6)
|
||
|
||
- [x] **H.66 Behavioral finance** (2025-10-20) - **High confidence**
|
||
- **Herd Mentality**: Following crowd even when you disagree
|
||
- Most significant behavioral bias (34% of investment decisions)
|
||
- Example: Client disagrees with forum consensus but goes along anyway ✓
|
||
- **Four Major Biases Comparison** - "FFFF" mnemonic:
|
||
- **F**ollow (Herd) - copy others despite disagreement
|
||
- **F**irst (Anchoring) - stuck on initial information
|
||
- **F**ind (Confirmation) - seek supporting evidence for own beliefs
|
||
- **F**resh (Recency) - focus on latest info, assume trends continue
|
||
- **Critical distinction**: Herd = follow OTHERS, Confirmation = follow OWN beliefs
|
||
- **In slides**: Brief mention, pages 180-185
|
||
|
||
- [x] **H.67 Sources of money conflict** (2025-10-20) - **High confidence**
|
||
- **Framework**: Source vs Symptom
|
||
- SOURCE = Underlying WHY conflicts happen (root cause)
|
||
- SYMPTOM = Surface topics they argue about
|
||
- **Power Imbalance from Income Disparity**:
|
||
- One partner earns significantly more → creates control dynamics
|
||
- "I make money, I decide" leads to resentment
|
||
- Affects ALL financial decisions (not just one topic)
|
||
- PRIMARY source identified by CFP Board (56% men, 59% women report conflicts)
|
||
- **Other Sources**: Different values, financial secrecy, money scripts from childhood
|
||
- **Topics (not sources)**: Education spending, risk tolerance, generational differences
|
||
- **CFP Application**: Address root causes, ensure equal voice in meetings
|
||
- **Not in slides** - researched online
|
||
|
||
### Not Yet Studied (4/6 topics)
|
||
|
||
- [ ] **H.65** Attitudes, values, biases
|
||
- **In slides**: Brief mention only
|
||
|
||
- [ ] **H.68** Principles of counseling
|
||
- **Not in slides** - need other materials
|
||
|
||
- [ ] **H.69** Communication
|
||
- **In slides**: Fundamentals pages 30-35 (Communication techniques, Motivational interviewing)
|
||
|
||
- [ ] **H.70** Crisis events
|
||
- **In slides**: Fundamentals pages 55-60 (Planning for crisis events)
|
||
|
||
**Priority**: Low (7% of exam) - Brief review final week, supplement with other materials
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Current Knowledge Gaps (Action Required)
|
||
|
||
### 🔴 HIGH SEVERITY
|
||
|
||
**1. E.38 Business Taxation** - Section 179, MACRS Depreciation
|
||
- **Status**: PARTIALLY RESOLVED (2025-10-28, 2025-11-01)
|
||
- ✅ C Corporation distributions - MASTERED (2025-10-28)
|
||
- ✅ Section 1221 vs 1231 property - MASTERED (2025-11-01)
|
||
- ❌ Section 179 expensing - Still needs work
|
||
- ❌ MACRS depreciation - Still needs work
|
||
- ❌ Mid-quarter convention - Still needs work
|
||
- **Impact**: Critical for Tax Planning (14% of exam)
|
||
- **In slides**: Tax slides pages 135-145
|
||
- **Action**: Dedicate fresh session to Section 179/MACRS IMMEDIATELY
|
||
- **Date identified**: 2025-10-11
|
||
- **Partial resolutions**:
|
||
- 2025-10-28: C corp distributions mastered
|
||
- 2025-11-01: Section 1221 vs 1231 mastered (capital asset definition and §1231 special treatment)
|
||
|
||
### 🟡 MEDIUM SEVERITY
|
||
|
||
**2. F.51 Early Withdrawal Exceptions & 72(t)**
|
||
- **Status**: SUBSTANTIALLY RESOLVED (2025-11-01)
|
||
- ✅ Rule of 55 - MASTERED (2025-10-23)
|
||
- ✅ QDRO exceptions - MASTERED (2025-10-23)
|
||
- ✅ IRA vs 401(k) exception differences - MASTERED (2025-10-23)
|
||
- ✅ "HIDES" mnemonic - MASTERED (2025-10-23)
|
||
- ✅ Hardship withdrawals & in-service rollover restrictions - MASTERED (2025-11-01)
|
||
- ❌ 72(t) SEPP calculations - Still needs work
|
||
- **In slides**: Retirement slides pages 85-95
|
||
- **Action**: Only 72(t) SEPP calculations remaining (low exam priority)
|
||
|
||
**3. C.23 Life Insurance Types**
|
||
- **Status**: Know beneficiary strategies, not types/features
|
||
- **In slides**: Insurance slides pages 45-80
|
||
- **Action**: Study term/whole/universal/variable details
|
||
|
||
### 🟢 LOW SEVERITY (Quick fixes)
|
||
|
||
**4. F.45 Social Security Early Filing Reduction %**
|
||
- **Issue**: Thinks ~5%, actually 5/9 for first 3 years, 5/12 beyond
|
||
- **Action**: Memorize formula (5 minutes)
|
||
|
||
### ✅ RECENTLY RESOLVED
|
||
|
||
**5. F.45 Medicare Cost Calculations** (Resolved 2025-10-18)
|
||
- **Previous status**: Medium severity - day ranges and cost-sharing confusion
|
||
- **Resolution**: Comprehensive deep dive with online research
|
||
- **Now**: HIGH confidence - all details mastered
|
||
|
||
**6. E.41 Section 1245 vs 1250 Confusion** (Resolved 2025-10-28)
|
||
- **Previous status**: Student confused about when depreciation = ordinary income vs capital gain
|
||
- **Resolution**: Clear distinction taught, student correctly identified tax code complexity
|
||
- **Now**: HIGH confidence - knows 1245 = ordinary income (equipment), 1250 = 25% capital gain (buildings)
|
||
|
||
**7. D.31 Capital Market Line Basics** (Resolved 2025-10-28)
|
||
- **Previous status**: Zero knowledge, only knew "there's a line"
|
||
- **Resolution**: Complete conceptual teaching with formula, visual, and example
|
||
- **Now**: MEDIUM confidence - formula memorized, needs practice problems
|
||
|
||
**8. E.38 C Corporation Distribution Mechanics** (Resolved 2025-10-28)
|
||
- **Previous status**: Didn't understand E&P vs cash distinction or distribution ordering
|
||
- **Resolution**: Waterfall rule mastered, excellent critical question asked by student
|
||
- **Now**: HIGH confidence - perfect understanding of dividend → basis → capital gain ordering
|
||
|
||
**9. F.48 Nondiscrimination Coverage Testing Direction** (Resolved 2025-10-29)
|
||
- **Previous status**: Confused about who must be 70% of whom
|
||
- **Resolution**: Clear explanation of NHCEs (protected) must be 70% of HCEs (advantaged)
|
||
- **Now**: HIGH confidence - understands formula direction and fairness logic
|
||
|
||
**10. F.45 Social Security Fully vs Currently Insured** (Resolved 2025-10-29)
|
||
- **Previous status**: Didn't know these were two different statuses
|
||
- **Resolution**: Fully (lifetime credits, Age-22) vs Currently (6 of 13 quarters, recent work)
|
||
- **Now**: MEDIUM-HIGH confidence - understands difference, student noted "tricky" (accurate!)
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 18-Day Study Plan (October 19 - November 5)
|
||
|
||
### 🔴 URGENT - Days 1-6 (Oct 19-24)
|
||
|
||
**Day 1-2**: E.38 Business Taxation (HIGHEST PRIORITY GAP)
|
||
- Section 179 expensing ($1,220K for 2024, phase-out $3,050K)
|
||
- MACRS depreciation
|
||
- Study with FRESH mind, not when tired
|
||
|
||
**Day 3-4**: F.49 Non-Qualified Plans (HIGHEST WEIGHTED DOMAIN)
|
||
- Traditional IRA deductibility rules
|
||
- Roth IRA phaseouts and ordering rules
|
||
- SEP and SIMPLE plans
|
||
- Stock options (ISOs vs NQSOs)
|
||
|
||
**Day 5-6**: G.57 Gift/Estate/GST Tax (FOUNDATION FOR ESTATE)
|
||
- Annual exclusion $18K, lifetime $13.61M
|
||
- Tax calculation: $1M = $345,800 + 40% over
|
||
- Form 709, Form 706
|
||
- GSTT basics
|
||
|
||
### 🟡 HIGH PRIORITY - Days 7-12 (Oct 25-30)
|
||
|
||
**Day 7-8**: B.7-B.11 General Principles (15% OF EXAM - WEAK AREA)
|
||
- 7-step financial planning process
|
||
- Financial statements
|
||
- Ratios (Current, Emergency, Housing 28%, Debt 36%)
|
||
- Business cycle (4 phases)
|
||
- Monetary/Fiscal policy
|
||
|
||
**Day 9-10**: D.30-D.32 Investment Quantitative & Valuation
|
||
- Standard deviation, Beta, Sharpe/Treynor/Jensen
|
||
- Duration and bond immunization
|
||
- Dividend discount model
|
||
- Asset allocation and CAPM
|
||
|
||
**Day 11-12**: G.59-G.60 Trusts and Marital Deduction
|
||
- GRAT, GRUT, QPRT, ILIT
|
||
- Crummey provisions
|
||
- QTIP trust requirements
|
||
- Terminable interest rule
|
||
|
||
### 🟢 MEDIUM PRIORITY - Days 13-15 (Oct 31 - Nov 2)
|
||
|
||
**Day 13**: C.17, C.21, C.22 - Insurance Fundamentals
|
||
- Risk management matrix
|
||
- Long-term care (ADLs, tax deductions)
|
||
- Annuities (types, taxation)
|
||
|
||
**Day 14**: F.44, F.52 - Retirement Income Planning
|
||
- Sustainable withdrawal rates (3-4%)
|
||
- Withdrawal strategies
|
||
- Capital preservation
|
||
|
||
**Day 15**: Complete remaining D topics
|
||
- D.27 Investment vehicles
|
||
- D.29 Market cycles (EMH)
|
||
- D.33 IPS (RR TTLLU)
|
||
|
||
### ⚪ FINAL REVIEW - Days 16-18 (Nov 3-5)
|
||
|
||
**Day 16**: A.1-A.6 Professional Conduct (quick review)
|
||
- 6 Principles of Code of Ethics
|
||
- Fiduciary duties
|
||
- Form ADV
|
||
|
||
**Day 17**: H.65-H.70 Psychology (brief review)
|
||
- Behavioral finance
|
||
- Communication techniques
|
||
- Crisis planning
|
||
|
||
**Day 18**: FINAL REVIEW
|
||
- Review all knowledge gaps
|
||
- Practice problems from highest-weighted domains
|
||
- Formulas to memorize:
|
||
- First $1M estate tax = $345,800
|
||
- Social Security reduction: 5/9 then 5/12
|
||
- RMD: Balance / Life expectancy factor
|
||
- All 2024 limits ($18K, $23K, $69K, $13.61M, etc.)
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Study Materials Available
|
||
|
||
### 2024 Dalton Review Slides (1,088 pages total)
|
||
|
||
1. **Fundamentals** (90 pages)
|
||
- Professional Conduct A.1-A.6 ✓
|
||
- General Principles B.7-B.16 ✓
|
||
|
||
2. **Retirement** (182 pages - MOST COMPREHENSIVE)
|
||
- Retirement Planning F.44-F.53 ✓
|
||
- All plan types, rules, distributions ✓
|
||
|
||
3. **Tax** (150 pages)
|
||
- Tax Planning E.36-E.43 ✓
|
||
- Comprehensive coverage ✓
|
||
|
||
4. **Investments** (188 pages)
|
||
- Investment Planning D.27-D.35 ✓
|
||
- Complete with formulas ✓
|
||
|
||
5. **Insurance** (188 pages)
|
||
- Risk Management C.17-C.26 ✓
|
||
- All insurance types ✓
|
||
|
||
6. **Estate** (200 pages)
|
||
- Estate Planning G.54-G.64 ✓
|
||
- Gift/estate/GST tax comprehensive ✓
|
||
|
||
### Materials Needed
|
||
|
||
⚠️ **Psychology of Financial Planning** (H.65-H.70)
|
||
- Only minimal coverage in slides
|
||
- Need to supplement for final week
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Key Formulas to Memorize
|
||
|
||
### Investment Planning (D.31)
|
||
- **Capital Market Line (CML)**: **E(Rp) = Rf + [(E(RM) - Rf) / σM] × σp**
|
||
- E(Rp) = Expected portfolio return
|
||
- Rf = Risk-free rate
|
||
- E(RM) = Expected market return
|
||
- σM = Market standard deviation
|
||
- σp = Portfolio standard deviation
|
||
- **CML Slope** (Market price of risk): **(E(RM) - Rf) / σM**
|
||
|
||
### Tax Planning (E.38, E.41)
|
||
|
||
**C Corporation Distribution Waterfall:**
|
||
1. Dividend income (up to E&P)
|
||
2. Return of basis (tax-free)
|
||
3. Capital gain (after basis exhausted)
|
||
|
||
**Depreciation Recapture:**
|
||
- **Section 1245** (Equipment): Ordinary income, all in Year 1
|
||
- **Section 1250** (Buildings, straight-line): Capital gain at 25%, can defer with installment
|
||
|
||
**Installment Sale:**
|
||
- **Gross Profit %** = **(Sale Price - Adjusted Basis) ÷ Contract Price**
|
||
- **Gain per payment** = Payment × Gross Profit %
|
||
|
||
### Estate & Gift Tax (NOT on formula sheet)
|
||
- First $1 million tax = **$345,800**
|
||
- Over $1 million = **40%**
|
||
- 2024 Annual exclusion = **$18,000** ($36,000 split)
|
||
- 2024 Lifetime exclusion = **$13,610,000**
|
||
- 2024 Applicable credit = **$5,389,800**
|
||
|
||
### Social Security
|
||
- Early filing reduction: **5/9** for first 36 months, **5/12** beyond
|
||
- Delayed credit: **8%/year** (born 1943+)
|
||
- Earnings test 2024: **$22,320** ($1 for $2), **$59,520** FRA year ($1 for $3)
|
||
|
||
### Medicare 2024
|
||
- Part A deductible: **$1,632** per benefit period
|
||
- Days 61-90: **$408/day**
|
||
- Days 91-150: **$816/day** (lifetime reserve)
|
||
- SNF days 21-100: **$204/day**
|
||
- Part B premium: **$174.70/month**
|
||
- Part B deductible: **$240/year**
|
||
|
||
### Retirement 2024
|
||
- 401(k) deferral: **$23,000** (+$7,500 catch-up)
|
||
- IRA contribution: **$7,000** (+$1,000 catch-up)
|
||
- DC max: **$69,000** ($76,500 with catch-up)
|
||
- DB max benefit: **$275,000**
|
||
- Covered compensation: **$345,000**
|
||
- SIMPLE: **$16,000** (+$3,500 catch-up)
|
||
|
||
### Education 2024
|
||
- 529A ABLE: **$18,000/year**
|
||
- Coverdell: **$2,000/year**
|
||
- AOTC: **$2,500/student** (100% of $2K + 25% of $2K)
|
||
- LLC: **$2,000/family** (20% of $10K)
|
||
- Student loan interest: **$2,500/year** deduction
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Strengths to Leverage
|
||
|
||
✅ **Retirement Planning** - 100% covered, highest-weighted domain (18%) - COMPLETE!
|
||
✅ **Investment Planning** - 100% covered, second-highest domain (17%) - COMPLETE!
|
||
✅ **Tax Planning** - 100% covered, strong calculation skills (14%) - COMPLETE!
|
||
✅ **Insurance** - 100% covered (11%) - COMPLETE!
|
||
✅ **1031 Exchanges** - Perfect understanding, can teach others
|
||
✅ **Medicare** - Comprehensive knowledge after deep dive
|
||
✅ **Quick learner** - Masters calculations once formula understood
|
||
✅ **Strong retention** - Demonstrates across multiple sessions
|
||
✅ **Self-awareness** - Knows when tired, asks for breaks
|
||
✅ **EXCEPTIONAL critical thinking** - Identifies question flaws and imprecise terminology (Oct 29)
|
||
✅ **Professional judgment** - Recognizes CFP should test real-world communication (Oct 29)
|
||
✅ **Excellent analogies** - Creates powerful examples to illustrate points (Oct 29)
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Daily Study Approach
|
||
|
||
1. **Morning (Fresh Mind)**: Hardest topics (Business tax, quantitative concepts)
|
||
2. **Afternoon**: Medium difficulty (Memorization, formulas)
|
||
3. **Evening**: Review and practice problems
|
||
4. **Before Bed**: Quick review of day's formulas
|
||
|
||
**Key Rules**:
|
||
- ⚠️ Don't study business taxation when tired!
|
||
- ✓ Take breaks every 90 minutes
|
||
- ✓ Practice problems after learning each concept
|
||
- ✓ Review previous day's material each morning
|
||
- ✓ Use slides' exam tips and practice questions
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
**Next Update**: After each study session, update mastered topics and adjust plan |